Classification of regions of the Central federal district on the basis of innovative development parameters using cluster analysis
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2023-23-2-126-141
Abstract
In the context of the emergence of interdisciplinary tasks, it becomes necessary to make atypical decisions. Therefore, the innovation process comes to the fore, which, due to its high flexibility and adaptability, allows minimizing negative consequences. The article explores the significance of the innovation process and, on the basis of a hierarchical cluster analysis, establishes cause-and-effect relationships for classifying the regions of the Central Federal District as primary clusters. The proposed approach can subsequently become a useful tool in the development and formation of a set of measures aimed at regulating the socio-economic situation of the federal districts and their regions.
About the Authors
O. S. VakulenkoRussian Federation
Vakulenko Olesya Sergeevna, post-graduet student
S. A. Grachev
Russian Federation
Grachev Sergey Aleksandrovich, Associate Professor, PhD in Economics
ResearcherID: N-6875-2016 Scopus Author ID: 57207967580
References
1. Nikitskaya E.F., Valishvili M.A. Faktory innovatsionnogo razvitiya natsional'noi ekonomiki: mezhdunarodnye aspekty // Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki. – 2021. – Tom 11. – № 4. – S. 1355-1370. – doi: 10.18334/vinec.11.4.113773.
2. Tereshkina N.E. Vliyanie pandemii na razvitie innovatsii v mire // Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki. – 2021. – Tom 11. – № 4. – S. 1289-1300. – doi: 10.18334/vinec.11.4.113800
3. Kuz'minykh N.A., Militskaya A.O. Sistema upravleniya innovatsionnym razvitiem regiona v kontekste tsifrovoi transformatsii // Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki. – 2022. – Tom 12. – № 4. – S. 2213-2230. – doi: 10.18334/vinec.12.4.116800
4. Shchepakin M.B., Khandamova E.F., Bzhennikova D.G. Chelovekotsentrichnyi resurs ‒ draiver innovatsionnykh izmenenii v usloviyakh mobilizatsionnoi ekonomiki // Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki. – 2023. – Tom 13. – № 1. – doi: 10.18334/vinec.13.1.117496.
5. Kraft I. Globalizatsiya i razvitie innovatsionnoi sistemy natsional'noi ekonomiki // Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki. – 2015. – Tom 5. – № 3. – S. 79-94. – doi: 10.18334/inec.5.3.588.
6. Etikariena A. Perbedaan perilaku kerja inovatif berdasarkan karakteristik individu karyawan // Jurnal Psikologi [Online]. – 2019. – Volume 17(2). – pp. 107-118. https://doi.org/10.14710/jp.17.2.107-118.
7. Suwardana H., Kalista A. Innovation and Shelf-Character: The Way of Organizational Existence in the Pandemic Era // Innovation Reresearch Journal. – 2021. – November, 93. – doi:10.30587/innovation.v2i2.3005.
8. Sun Yu, et al. Technological Innovation Research: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach // Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM). – 2021. – 29, no.6: 1-22. – http://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.20211101.oa32.
9. Fornstedt H. Innovation Resistance. Moving Beyond Dominant Framings // Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology. – 2021. – 146. 329 pp. – Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. – URL: http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1596886/FULLTEXT01.pdf
10. Inamov F. Iqtisodiyot rivojida innovatsiyaning ahamiyati // Cience And Innovation International Scientific Journal. – 2022. – volume 1. – doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.713985.
11. Goel, Rajeev K. Do various innovation linkages enhance innovation? International evidence // Kiel Working Paper No. 2211. – 2022. – URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/251203
Review
For citations:
Vakulenko O.S., Grachev S.A. Classification of regions of the Central federal district on the basis of innovative development parameters using cluster analysis. World of Economics and Management. 2023;23(2):126-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2023-23-2-126-141