Preview

World of Economics and Management

Advanced search

Social Impact Assessment in Sport: Russian Context

https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2023-23-2-70-84

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the current practice in the assessment of Russian social projects in the field of physical culture and sports. By such projects, the authors mean initiatives aimed at solving social problems (for example, in the field of health care, education or crime reduction) through sports. Approaches to the evaluation of social projects in general, and its features for sports, in particular, are still poorly represented in the academic literature. At the same time, the reduction in funding and the relevance of choosing a limited number of initiatives from plenty will make this topic even more in demand. As a research methodology, the authors used an analysis of existing grant competitions and review of methods used by charitable organizations. In particular, the provisions of 11 competitions aimed at supporting social initiatives in the field of sports, as well as annual reports of several charitable foundations, were considered. As a result, it was found that expert models and change theory are among the most popular. Besides authors present a comparative analysis of the assessment criteria used. Foreign assessment practice is more focused on monetary models, including SROI and cost-benefit, which are not yet sufficiently common in Russia. The conducted research can be of value for organizations that implement and support social projects in the field of sports, as well as for the public sector, primarily from the standpoint of developing their own assessment methodology and substantiating the criteria used. 

About the Authors

I. V. Solntsev
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Ilya V. Solntsev, Doctor of Economics, Head of the Department of Marketing and Sports Business

AuthorID: 683561

WOS Research ID: C-5644-2013

Scopus Author ID: 56976343300



R. M. Olkhovsky
National Research University ITMO
Russian Federation

Roman M. Olkhovsky, Candidate of Sciences in Sociology, Director of the Analytical Center for Physical Culture and Sports Technologies

AuthorID: 875517



E. A. Eremina
National Research University ITMO

Ekaterina A. Eremina, Analyst, Analytical Center for Physical Culture and Sports Technologies

AuthorID: 1091237



References

1. Ivushkina N. V. Social effect of investment processes = Sotsial’nyĭ effekt investitsionnykh protsessov: dis... kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.01. Moscow, 2021, RGB OD, 61:02–8/403–8. (in Russ.)

2. Rozhdestvenskaya N. V., Boguslavskaya S. B., Bobrova O. S. Evaluation of the effectiveness of projects of non-profit organizations, social entrepreneurship and civil initiatives. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Polytechnic University, 2016. 168 p. (in Russ.)

3. Ebrahim, A., Rangan, V. K. 2014. What Impact? A Framework for Measuring the Scale and Scope of Social Performance. California Management Review 56 (3): 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2014.56.3.118

4. Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation. 2020. Applying Theory of Change to Strategic Audit and Strategic Planning in Russia. Expert note. Applying Theory of Change to Strategic Audit M., 2020 28 s., https://ach.gov.ru/upload/pdf/AuditInsights.pdf (in Russ.)

5. Weiss C. H. et al. Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In: New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts. 1995. Vol. 1, pp. 65-92.

6. Weiss C. H. Theory?based evaluation: Past, present, and future // New directions for evaluation. 1997, No. 76, 41-55.

7. Sport England evaluation framework. 2022. https://evaluationframework.sportengland.org

8. Sport Canada. 2021. Grouped Evaluation of Sport Canada Programs 2015-16 to 2019-20, https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/corporate/publications/evaluations/grouped-evaluation-sport-canada-program.html#a3

9. Sport New Zealand. Outcomes framework. Creating a sport NZ. Outcomes framework, https://sportnz.org.nz/resources/sport-nz-outcomes-framework/

10. Sport New Zealand. 2013. He Oranga Poutama: What we have learned. A report on the developmental evaluation of He Oranga Poutama, https://sportnz.org.nz/media/3428/hop-what-we-have-learned-lr.pdf

11. “Gold standard” impact best cases and practices measuring social business impacts. 2021. Research Institute emerging markets business schools SKOLKOVO (IEMS) URL: https://fcsp.ru/upload/iblock/22f/b6svhtvvnjp4428oa7hvp05aypgpyna9/Zolotoy%20standart%20impakta.pdf

12. Perrini F., Costanzo, L. A. and Karatas-Ozkan. Measuring impact and creating change: a comparison of the main methods for social enterprises. Corporate Governance, 2021, Vol. 21 No. 2, 237-251. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2020-0062


Review

For citations:


Solntsev I.V., Olkhovsky R.M., Eremina E.A. Social Impact Assessment in Sport: Russian Context. World of Economics and Management. 2023;23(2):70-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2023-23-2-70-84

Views: 280


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0429 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5375 (Online)