Estimation of Socio-Economic Potential of the Far Eastern Federal District
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2022-22-3-35-50
Abstract
To implement the strategic plans for national economic growth, it is necessary to develop the Far Eastern Federal District (FEFD), which is a link between Russia and the Asia-Pacific Region (APR). The aim of the work is to analyze and evaluate the main macroeconomic trends affecting the socio-economic development of the Far Eastern Federal District. The shift-share method and empirical analysis of the main macroeconomic indicators of the region were used as the main research methodology. Due to the fact that the foundation for the development of the region is formed by the factors of influence that formed before the coronavirus pandemic and the start of a special operation in Ukraine, the analysis of the Far Eastern Federal District was carried out for the period from 2014 to 2019. The study showed that, in general, the Far East showed positive dynamics in the analyzed period, due to the fact that the growth rates of the district's industries exceeded the national ones, which was ensured both by high external demand for their products and by the positive results of the program for the accelerated development of the Far Eastern Federal District, which had a favorable effect in the areas of specialization of the region. However, industries with a high share of value added are in a crisis situation, which may neutralize the positive trends in the development of the region in the near future, and there are still no favorable changes in the social sphere, which is primarily characterized by a continuing decline in the region's population.
Keywords
About the Authors
O. I. GulakovaRussian Federation
Olga I. Gulakova, Candidate of Sciences (Economic), Senior Researcher
Novosibirsk
Scopus AuthorID: 57202766282
V. D. Moissenko
Russian Federation
Viktoriya D. Moiseenko, bachelor
Novosibirsk
References
1. Elkhina I. A. Monitoring of structural shifts in the economy of Russian regions in the context of the development of convergent technologies. Basic and applied research in the modern world, 2016, no. 16-2, pp. 80-82
2. Melnikova L.V., Sivyh E.P. The Shift-Share Method as a Tool for Analyzing the Economic Dynamics of Russian Regions. In: Current issues of economy and sociology. Book of papers: 18th Fall Conference of young scientists in Akademgorodok, 2020, pp. 72-74. (in Russ.)
3. Miheeva N. N. Structural Factors of Regional Dynamics: Measurement and Evaluation. Spatial Economics, 2013, no. 1, pp. 11-32. (in Russ.)
4. Barff R, Prentice L. K. Dynamic Shift-Share Analysis. Growth and Change, 1998, no. 19 (2), pp. 1-10.
5. Chun-Yun Shi, Yang Yang. A Review of Shift-Share Analysis and Its Application in Tourism. International Journal of Management Perspectives, 2008, Vol.1, No.1 pp.21-30.
6. Esteban-Marquillas, J.M. A reinterpretation of shift-share analysis. Regional and Urban Economics, 1972, no. 2(3), pp. 249-255.
7. Lindsay B E., Martin S. E. An application of the bishop-simpson method: a shift-share variant. Journal’s Of The Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association (NAREA), 1978, no. 7 (01), pp. 47-49.
8. Fernández M.M., López A. J. Spatial shift-share analysis versus spatial filtering. An application to the Spanish Employment. Empirical Economics, 2008, no. 34(1), pp. 123-142.
9. Selting A., Loveridge S. A Summary of the Literature on Shift-share Analysis: Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, College of Agriculture, 1972. no.2(3). – C. 249-255
10. Melnikova L. V. Modern regional economy: theories and models. Novosibirsk, NSU, 2015, pp. 275-288. (in Russ.)
11. Kuteleva A.V., et.al. Free port of Vladivostok: challenges and solutions. Russia and the Asia-Pacific, 2021, no. 1, pp. 104-124. (in Russ.)
12. Minakir P. A. “Program” economy: Far East. Spatial Economics, 2019, no. 2, pp. 7-16. (in Russ.)
13. Makar S. V., et.al. Spatial development of the Russian Far East: demographic and socio-economic factors. Population, 2021, no. 1, pp. 117-130. (in Russ.)
14. Aganbegyan A. G. Development of the Far East: a national program in the context of national projects. Spatial Economics, 2019, no. 3, pp. 165-181. (in Russ.)
15. Gulakova O. I. Socio-economic development of the Far East: analysis and evaluation. Bulletin of NSUEM, 2018, no. 4, pp. 143-156. (in Russ.)
16. Yegorov N. A. Features of the formation of TASED in the Far East. International research journal, 2019, no. 8-2 (86), pp. 32-37. (in Russ.)
17. Timofeyev D. N. The place and role of the fishing industry in the economy of the Far Eastern Federal District. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Management, 2019, no. 1(26), pp. 317-320. (in Russ.)
18. Levin Y.U. A. et.al. Investment and institutional support for the development of the natural resource sector of the economy of the Far East. Innovation and investment, 2020, no. 7, pp. 207-211. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Gulakova O.I., Moissenko V.D. Estimation of Socio-Economic Potential of the Far Eastern Federal District. World of Economics and Management. 2022;22(3):35-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2022-22-3-35-50