Improving the Measurement of a Company’s Performance Effectiveness
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2022-22-1-165-184
Abstract
In a constantly changing business environment, the company’s management faces new challenges, and the complexity of management increases. In this regard, since the end of the 1980th, after a criticism wave of traditional (financial) methods, performance measurement systems (PMS) have come to the fore, offering ideas and technologies based on a combination of both, financial and non-financial indicators, which are focused on the strategic line of a company.
The purpose of this academic paper is to develop new PMS that combine existing systems’ advantages, as well as eliminating their inherent limitations.
Therefore, in the course of the study, the main limitations of existing performance measurement systems were identified, and a new PMS was proposed, which had a number of advantages over the known ones. This system is focused on maximizing the company’s value, describes contribution to the change in the value of each main business process, product and client, which allows one to get away from aggregation and evaluate performance at each level, as well as turn a set of useful, but somewhat heterogeneous indicators into a system with a clear target.
This PMS is based on the concepts of value-based management (Value Based Management, VBM), strategic management (Strategic Management, SA), process management (Business Process Management, BPM), as well as on the provisions of the performance management concept (Performance Management, PM).
The developed performance measurement system is purposefully based on well-known categories and indicators to increase its practical significance. This PMS will help management to understand what the business is made of, what processes affect the efficiency of its work within the company. After all, the expediency of an adequate performance measurement for the successful functioning of the company in modern conditions is very significant, since it can help management both, to achieve the desired results and also to see the reserves for improving efficiency.
About the Author
A. N. PristavkaRussian Federation
Alina N. Pristavka, Post-graduate Student
Novosibirsk
References
1. Cross K.F., Lynch R.L. The “SMART” Way to Define and Sustain Success. National Productivity Review, 1988/89, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 23-33.
2. Keegan D.P., Eiler R.G., Jones C.R. Are Your Performance Measures Obsolete? Management Accounting, 1989, vol. 70, no. 12, p. 45-50.
3. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. The Balanced Scorecard – Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 1992, vol. 70, no. 1, p. 71-79.
4. Ittner C.D., Larcker D.F. Coming up short on nonfinancial performance measurement. Harvard Business Review, 2003, vol. 81, no. 11, p. 88-95.
5. Reilly G.P., Reilly R.R. Using a measure network to understand and deliver value. Journal of Cost Management (November/December), 2000, p. 5-14.
6. Neely A. The evolution of performance measurement research: developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the next. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2005, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1264-1277.
7. Meyer M.V. Ocenka effektivnosti biznesa: per. s angl. [Evaluation of business performance: trans. from English]. Moscow: Vershina, 2004. (in Russ.)
8. Glushchenko K.P. Evaluation of the transport projects effectiveness: experience and problems (part 2). Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University, Social and economic sciences, 2012, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 40-46. (in Russ.)
9. Watts T., McNair-Connolly C.J. New performance measurement and management control systems. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 2012, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 226-241.
10. Mkrtchyan G.M., Kostylev A.O., Skopina L.V. The effect of a manager's overconfidence as a factor of uncertainty in assessing oil and gas investment projects. Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Social and economic sciences, 2013, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 102-113. (in Russ.)
11. Thompson A.A., Strickland A.J. Strategicheskij menedzhment. Iskusstvo razrabotki i realizacii strategii. [Strategic management. The Art of Strategy Development and Implementation]. Moscow: Banks and stock exchanges, UNITI, 1998. (in Russ.)
12. Parmenter D. Klyuchevye pokazateli effektivnosti. Razrabotka, vnedrenie i primenenie reshayushchih pokazatelej. [Key Performance Indicators Developing. Implementing and Using Winning KPIs]. Moscow: Olimp-Biznes, 2007. (in Russ.)
13. Porter M. Konkurentnoe preimushchestvo: kak dostich' vysokogo rezul'tata i obespechit' ego ustojchivost'. [Competitive advantage: How to Achieve High Results and Ensure Its Sustainability]. Moscow: Alpina Digital, 1985. (in Russ.)
14. Chernov S.S. Classification of organizational strategies: from theory to practice. Russian Economic Internet Journal, 2007, no. 3, p.60. (in Russ.)
15. Popov V.N., Kasyanov V.S., Savchenko I.P. Sistemnyj analiz v menedzhmente: uchebnoe posobie. [System analysis in management: A Textbook]. Moscow: KNORUS, 2007. (in Russ.)
16. Erhardt M. Finansovyj menedzhment. [Financial management. 10th ed. Transl. from English. Ed. E.A. Dorofeeva]. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2009. (in Russ.)
17. Cheremushkin S.V., Ponkrashina G.A. Economic value added and capital costs: Market and Accounting Approaches. Financial management, 2008, no. 6, p.50-69. (in Russ.)
18. Ansoff I. Strategicheskij menedzhment. [Strategic management]. Moscow: Economics, 1989. (in Russ.)
19. Kachalov I.V. Five key strategies to increase sales. Practical marketing, 2003, no. 12, p. 4-9. (in Russ.)
20. Esipov V.E. Ceny i cenoobrazovanie. [Prices and pricing]. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2006. (in Russ.)
21. Opekunova M.V., Ivashchenko N.S. Types of production strategies and methods for their development. Economics today: Current State and Development Prospects: collection of materials of the International Scientific Conference of Young Researchers: Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Moscow State University of Design and Technology", 2017, p. 324-327. (in Russ.)
22. Evtodieva T.E. Strategic Postulates of Procurement Logistics. A-factor: Research and Development (Humanities Sciences), 2017, no. 1, p. 6. (in Russ.)
23. Dybskaya V.V., Sergeev V.I. Corporate logistics Strategies And Technologies: Choice and Implementation Methods. Loginfo, 2002, no. 3. (in Russ.)
24. Vasilieva O. E. Development of an After-Sales Service Strategy. Bulletin of Kurgan State University. Series: Humanities Sciences, 2005, no. 3, p.166-171. (in Russ.)
25. Porter M. E. Konkurentnaya strategiya: metodika analiza otraslej i konkurentov. [Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors]. Moscow: Alpina Business Books, 2005. (in Russ.)
26. Kot K. What is a Sales Strategy and how to write it correctly. Calltouch Blog: [website]. 2020. URL: https://blog.calltouch.ru/ (date of access: 21.02.2022).
27. Kotler F. Osnovy marketinga. [Principles of Marketing]. Moscow: Williams, 2007. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Pristavka A.N. Improving the Measurement of a Company’s Performance Effectiveness. World of Economics and Management. 2022;22(1):165-184. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2022-22-1-165-184