Preview

World of Economics and Management

Advanced search

New directions in the study of environmental economics in 2006-2013: bibliometricanalysis based on EconLit

Abstract

The article proceeds a series of publications according to the concept of system-innovation bibliometriс analysis and mapping of economic literature (SIBAMEL) (created by Department of Economics of the National Research University - Novosibirsk State University and the Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences).  The new directions of research on economics that emerged in 2006—2013 are in the paper core. These new directions appeared on the intersections of the 10 micro fields that are the parts of the subject field Q5 Environmental Economics and all the rest micro fields that are included in the JEL classification. We were able to identify, to analyze, and to represent with different detailing 1982 intersections that contain one or more publications. As well as we suggest and illustrate two ways to accelerate the analysis of new research directions: 1) to use cubic representation of subject codes in addition to matrix; 2) to use a priory new subject fields (for instance C45 Neural Networks and Related Topics and D87Neuroeconomics).

About the Authors

G. M. Mkrtchyan
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS, Novosibirsk Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk
Russian Federation


M. V. Lychagin
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS, Novosibirsk Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk
Russian Federation


A. M. Lychagin
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk
Russian Federation


References

1. Lychagin M. V., Lychagin A. M., Shevtsov A. S.. Ed. Suslov V. I. Atlas of publications in economics on the EconLit basis. 1992–2005. Novosibirsk, Publ. House of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2007, 400 p. URL: http://nsu.ru/xmlui/handle/nsu/2455.

2. Mkrtchyn G. M., Lychagin M. V., Lychagin A. M. Rol' matematicheskih i kolichestvennyh metodov v issledovanii problem jekonomiki prirodopol'zovanij [Role of Mathematical and Quantitative Methods in the Study of Problems of Environmental Economics]. Vestnik of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Social and Economic Sciences, 2008, vol. 8, iss. 2, p. 55–62. (in Russ.)

3. Mkrtchyn G. M., Lychagin M. V., Lychagin A. M. Ekonomika okruzhayuschej sredy: 10 let burnogo razvitiya predmetnoj oblasti [Environmental Economics: 10 Years of Rapid Development of Subject Area]. Vestnik of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Social and Economic Sciences, 2010, vol. 10, iss. 2, p. 156–171. (in Russ.)

4. Lychagin M. V., Mkrtchyn G. M., Suslov V. I. Koncepciya sistemno-innovacionnogo bibliometricheskogo analiza i kartografirovaniya ekonomicheskoy literatury [The Concept of System-Innovation Bibliometric Analysis and Mapping of Economic Literature]. Vestnik of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Social and Economic Sciences, 2014, vol. 14, iss. 2, p. 127–141. (in Russ.)

5. Mennillo G., Schlenzig T., Friedrich E. (eds.). Balanced Growth: Finding Strategies for Sustainable Development, Management for Professionals series. New York and Heidelberg, Springer, 2012.

6. Donovan P., Hudson J. From Red to Green? How the Financial Credit Crunch Could Bankrupt the Environment. London and New York, Taylor and Francis, Earthscan, 2011.

7. Sugar V., and Mihajlo Tikvicki. Entrepreneurship vs Ecopreneurship – Integrated Approach to Housing. The 5th International Scientific Conference «Entrepreneurship and Macroeconomic Management: Reflections on the World in Turmoil», Pula, Croatia, March 24–26, 2011: Conference Proceedings. ed. Kristina Afric Rakitovac, V. Sugar and V. Bevanda, Pula: Juraj Dobrila University of Pula Department of Economics and Tourism Dr. Mijo Mirkovic. 2011, vol. 2, p. 1546–1569.

8. Nagendra S. M. Shiva, and Mukesh Khare Artificial Neural Network Based Line Source Models for Vehicular Exhaust Emission Predictions of an Urban Roadway. Transportation Research: Part D: Transport and Environment, 2004, vol. 9 (3), p. 199–208.

9. Coppola E., Jr., and Szidarovszky F. Conflict between Water Supply and Environmental Health Risk: A Computational Neural Network Approach. International Game Theory Review, 2004, vol. 6 (4), p. 475–492.

10. Kajitani Yoshio, Keith W. Hipel, and A. Ian McLeod. Forecasting Nonlinear Time Series with Feed-Forward Neural Networks: A Case Study of Canadian Lynx Data. Journal of Forecasting, 2005, Vol. 24 (2), р. 105–117.

11. Jemli Rim, Nouri Chtourou, and Rochdi Feki. Insurability Challenges under Uncertainty: An Attempt to Use the Artificial Neural Network for the Prediction of Losses from Natural Disasters. Panoeconomicus, 2010, vol. 57 (1), p. 43–60.

12. Gopal Sucharita, Curtis E. Woodcock, and Weiguo Liu. ARTMAP Neural Network Multisensor Fusion Model for Multiscale Land Cover Characterization. In Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis: Software Tools, Methods and Applications, ed. Manfred M. Fischer and Arthur Getis. Heidelberg and New York, Springer, 2010, p. 529–543

13. West D., Dellana S. An Empirical Analysis of Neural Network Memory Structures for Basin Water Quality Forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 2011, vol. 27 (3), р. 777–803. 14. Vlahogianni, Eleni I., Golias J. C., and Ioannis C. Ziomas. Traffic Flow Evolution Effects to Nitrogen Dioxides Predictability in Large Metropolitan Areas. Transportation Research: Part D: Transport and Environment, 2011, vol. 16 (4), p. 273–280.

14. Jemli Rim, Nouri Chtourou, Rochdi Feki, and Damien Bazin. La survenue des catastrophes naturelles: Classification des variables explicatives par les reseaux de neurones (With English summary). Ethics and Economics/Ethique Economique, 2012, vol. 9 (1), p. 107–128.

15. Grzeszczyk Tadeusz A. Barriers to Sustainable Development of Agribusiness in Poland. Actual Problems of Economics, 2012, vol. 129 (3), p. 365–74.

16. Lee, Timothy, and Runming Yao. Incorporating Technology Buying Behaviour into UKBased Long Term Domestic Stock Energy Models to Provide Improved Policy Analysis. Energy Policy, 2013, vol. 52 (1), p. 363–372.

17. Frey, Ulrich J., and Hannes Rusch. Modeling Ecological Success of Common Pool Resource Systems Using Large Datasets. World Development, 2014, vol. 59 (0), p. 93–103.

18. Melo A. P., Costola D., Lamberts R., and Hensen J. L. M. Development of Surrogate Models Using Artificial Neural Network for Building Shell Energy Labelling. Energy Policy, 2014, vol. 69 (0), p. 457–466.

19. Duquette E. N. Choice Difficulty and Risk Perceptions in Environmental Economics. PhD diss. University of Oregon, 2010.


Review

For citations:


Mkrtchyan G.M., Lychagin M.V., Lychagin A.M. New directions in the study of environmental economics in 2006-2013: bibliometricanalysis based on EconLit. World of Economics and Management. 2015;15(1):131–143. (In Russ.)

Views: 75


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0429 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5375 (Online)