Usual russian engineer: social portraits of subjects of work in the interior of the siberian industrial enterprises
Abstract
At the base of sociological case study done at four Siberian enterprises of military-industrial complex was made a test to construct a typology of workers that vary for different types and trajectories or strategies of subjectivity and can be viewed as kind of continuum – trans-subjectivity – which is characterized by the absence of the subject or by its full manifestation. The relations between phenomenon of subjectivity of the workers and type of social structures of enterprises (organizations) is the problem viewed in this article. The author supposes that in the modern tree-vertical-hierarchical structures dominates hypo-subjectivity of workers – phenomenon of the «death of the subject». An alternative is the rhizome structure which allows to «resurrect» the subject – productive worker and to reduce its firmly fixation in the system and to make his social action non-linear. At the base of sociological case study done at four Siberian enterprises of military-industrial complex was made a test to construct a typology of workers that vary for different types of subjectivity. Checking the evolution of interpretations of the concepts of «subjectivity» and «subject», the author concludes that a full-fledged social agent, the actor, the engine of historical and social processes is premature to write off, and that he may still have the main role in the context of transforming dynamics of contemporary social processes. Empirical referent of study and such an active acting, self-referential social agent capable of withstanding discourses of the power, as well as the pressure of capital and the prevailing social ethic machines are engineering and technical personnel of modern Russian industrial enterprises. Relevance in the study of the social stratum of workers due to the author's opinion, the need to enhance the most creative group of workers of the domestic industry, as the main social capital of productive economy, rebuilding and strengthening of which is seen today is extremely important.
References
1. Katsuk N. Postmodernistskaya sotsiologiya [Postmodern Sociology]. Postmodernizm. Entsiklopediya [Postmodernism. Encyclopedia]. Minsk, Publishing House «Interpresservice», 2001, p. 610–613. (in Russ.)
2. Dzheymison F. Postmodernizm, ili kul'turnaya logika pozdnego kapitalizma [Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism]. Sovremennaya literaturnaya teoriya. Antologiya [Contemporary Literary Theory. Anthology]. Moscow, Flint-science Publ., 2004, p. 272–293. (in Russ.)
3. Il'in I. Poststrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm [Poststructuralism. Deconstruction. Postmodernism]. Moscow, Intrada Publ., 1996. (in Russ.)
4. Khagurov T. Postmodernizm v pole massovoy kul'tury [Postmodernism in the field of mass culture]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 2007, no. 9, p.125–130. (in Russ.)
5. Matthewman S., Hoey D. What Happened to Postmodernism. Sociology, 2006, no. 40 (3), p. 529–547.
6. Sudas L. Postmodernizm [Postmodernism]. URL: http://www.chem.msu.su/rus/teaching/ sociology/postmodern.html (in Russ.)
7. Liotar ZH.-F. Sostoyaniye postmoderna [The Postmodern Condition]. Moscow, St.-Petersburg, Aleteia Publ., 1998. (in Russ.)
8. Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost' [The Fluid Modernity]. St.-Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2008. (in Russ.)
9. De Serto M. Izobreteniye povsednevnosti. 1. Iskusstvo delat' [The Invention of Everyday Life. 1. Arts of Doing]. St.-Petersburg, Publishing House of the European University in St.-Petersburg, 2013. (in Russ.)
10. Boudrillard J. Simvolicheskiy obmen i smert' [Symbolic Exchange and Death]. Moscow, Dobrosvet Publ., 2000. (in Russ.)
11. Boudrillard J. Obshchestvo potrebleniya. Yego mify i struktury [Consumer Society. Its myths and Structures]. Moscow, Publ. House «The Republic», «The Cultural Revolution», 2006. (in Russ.)
12. Bart R. Lektsiya [Lecture]. Kommunikativnyye strategii kul'tury: Khrestomatiya [Communicative Strategies of Culture: A Reader]. Novosibirsk, 2003, pt. 1, p. 51–90. (in Russ.)
13. Bart R. Udovol'stviye ot teksta [Pleasure of the text]. Izbrannyye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika [Selected Works: Semiotics. Poetics]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1994, p. 462–518. (in Russ.)
14. Bauman Z. Myslit' sotsiologicheski [Thinking Sociologically]. Moscow, Aspect Press, 1996. (in Russ.)
15. Giddens E. Devyat' tezisov o budushchem sotsiologii [Nine Theses on the Future of Sociology]. THESIS: teoriya i istoriya ekonomicheskikh i sotsial'nykh institutov i sistem [THESIS: Theory and History of Economic and Social Institutions and Systems], 1993, no. 1, p. 57–82. (in Russ.)
16. Giddens E. Uskol'zayushchiy mir: kak globalizatsiya menyayet nashu zhizn [The Missing Peace: How Globalization Is Changing Our Lives]. Moscow, The Whole World Publ., 2004. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Chudova I.A. Usual russian engineer: social portraits of subjects of work in the interior of the siberian industrial enterprises. World of Economics and Management. 2014;14(3):191–200.