Preview

World of Economics and Management

Advanced search

Usual russian engineer: social portraits of subjects of work in the interior of the siberian industrial enterprises

Abstract

At the base of sociological case study done at four Siberian enterprises of military-industrial complex was made a test to construct a typology of workers that vary for different types and trajectories or strategies of subjectivity and can be viewed as kind of continuum – trans-subjectivity – which is characterized by the absence of the subject or by its full manifestation. The relations between phenomenon of subjectivity of the workers and type of social structures of enterprises (organizations) is the problem viewed  in this article. The author supposes that in the modern tree-vertical-hierarchical structures dominates hypo-subjectivity of workers – phenomenon of the «death of the subject». An alternative is the rhizome structure which allows to «resurrect» the subject – productive worker and to reduce its firmly fixation in the system and to make his social action non-linear. At the base of sociological case study done at four Siberian enterprises of military-industrial complex was made a test to construct a typology of workers that vary for different types of subjectivity.  Checking the evolution of interpretations of the concepts of «subjectivity» and «subject», the author concludes that a full-fledged social agent, the actor, the engine of historical and social processes is premature to write off, and that he may still have the main role in the context of transforming dynamics of contemporary social processes. Empirical referent of study and such an active acting, self-referential social agent capable of withstanding discourses of the power, as well as the pressure of capital and the prevailing social ethic machines are engineering and technical personnel of modern Russian industrial enterprises. Relevance in the study of the social stratum of workers due to the author's opinion, the need to enhance the most creative group of workers of the domestic industry, as the main social capital of productive economy, rebuilding and strengthening of which is seen today is extremely important.

About the Author

V. Yu. Kombarov
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS, Novosibirsk
Russian Federation


References

1. Bart R. Smert' avtora. Mifologhii [Death of the author. Mythology]. In: Bart R. Izbrannie raboti. Semiotika. Poetika [Selected works: Semiotics. Poetic]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1994. (in Russ.)

2. Bakhtin M. Problemi tvorchestva Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky's Art]. Kiev, 1994. (in Russ.)

3. Berdyaev N. Tsarstvo dukha i tsarstvo kesarya [The Realm of Spirit and the Realm of Caesar]. Moscow, 1995. (in Russ.)

4. Bodriyar Zh. V teni molchalivogo men’shinstva [In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities]. Ekaterinburg, 2000. (in Russ.)

5. Bodriyar Zh. Obschestvo potreblemiya [The Consumer Society]. Moscow, Kul’turnaya revolyuzia Publ., 2006. (in Russ.)

6. Weber M. Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalisma [The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990. (in Russ.)

7. Debor Ghi-E. Obschestvo spektaklya [The Society of Spectacle]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 1998.

8. Dyurgheim E. O razdelenii obscestvennogo truda. Metod sociologhii [The Division of Labour in Society. Method of Sociology]. Moscow, Nauka, 1991. (in Russ.)

9. Dekart R. Izbrannie proizvedeniya [Selected Works]. Moscow, 1950. (in Russ.)

10. D’yakov A. Felix Gvattari: Shisoanalis i proizvodstvo sub’ektivnosti [Felix Guattari: Schizoanalysis and Production of Subjectivity]. Kursk, 2006. (in Russ.)

11. Kombarov V. Transotchuzhdenie kak sociologicheskiy fenomen sovremennosti. [Transalienation as Sociological Phenomenon of Our Times]. Novosibirsk, 2013. (in Russ.)

12. Lebon G. Psikhologiya narodov i mass [The Psychology of People and Masses]. Moscow, Terra Publ., 2008. (in Russ.)

13. Markuse G. Kriticheskaya teoriya obscestva [The Critical Theory of Society]. Moscow, AST, 2011. (in Russ.)

14. Ortega-I-Gasset Kh. Estetika. Filosofiya kul’turi [The Aesthetics. Philosophy of the Culture], Moscow, Art Publ., 1991. (in Russ.)

15. Smert’ sub’ekta [Death of the Subject]. Vsemirnaya enciclopediya filosofii [Worldwide Encyclopedia of Philosophy]. Moscow, 2001, p. 952–953. (in Russ.)

16. Fuko M. Germenevtika sub’ekta [The Hermeneutics of the Subject]. St.-Petersburg, 2007. (in Russ.)

17. Fuko M. Volya k istine: po tu storonu vlasti i sexual’nosti. Raboti rannih let [The Will to Truth: Beyond the Knowledge, Power and Sexuality. Work over the Years]. Moscow, 1996. (in Russ.)

18. Khorkkhaimer M., Adorno T. Dialektika prosvesceniya. Filosofskie fragmenti [Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments]. St.-Petersburg, Medium Publ., Yuventa Publ., 1997. (in Russ.)

19. Appelbaum R., Bonacich E. Behind the Label: Inequality in the Los Angeles Apparel Industry. University of California Press, 2000.

20. Deleuze G., Guattari F. Mille piani. Capitalismo e schizzofrenia. Castelvecchi, Roma, 2010.

21. Hackman J., Oldham G. Work redesign. Addison-Wesley, 1980.

22. Mottaz C. Some Determinations of Work Alienation. Sociological Quarterly, 1981, vol. 22 (4), p. 515–529.

23. Morris J., Steers R. Structural influences on organizational commitments. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1980, vol. 17, p. 50–57.

24. Seeman M. On the Meaning of Alienation. American Sociological Review, 1959, vol. 24, p. 784–788.

25. Vallas S. The Transformation of Work. JAI Press, 2001.


Review

For citations:


Kombarov V.Yu. Usual russian engineer: social portraits of subjects of work in the interior of the siberian industrial enterprises. World of Economics and Management. 2014;14(3):179–190. (In Russ.)

Views: 97


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0429 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5375 (Online)