EVOLUTION OF THEORIES AND EMPIRICAL MODELS OF A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMIC GROWTH, SCIENCE AND INNOVATIONS (PART 2)
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2018-18-1-5-17
Abstract
This article is a second chapter of the analytical review of existing theoretical models of a relationship between economic growth / GDP and indicators of science and innovation activities and empirical approaches to testing this relationship. Aim of the paper is a systematization of existing approaches to modeling of economic growth geared by science and innovations. The novelty of the current review lies in the authors’ criteria of interconnectedness of theoretical and empirical studies in the systematization of a wide range of publications presented in a final table-scheme. In the first chapter of the article, the authors discuss evolution of theoretical approaches while in the second chapter they present a time gap between theories and their empirical verification caused by the level of development of quantitative instruments such as econometric models. Results of the current study can be used by researchers and graduate students for familiarization with current scientific approaches that manifest a progress from theory to the empirical verification of the relationship «economic growth-innovations» for improvement of different types of models in spatial econometrics. To apply these models to management practices the presented review could be supplemented with new criteria for classification of knowledge production functions and other theories about the effect of science on the economic growth.
About the Authors
M. A. Kaneva
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS; Gaidar Insitute for Economic Policy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
G. A. Untura
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS; Novosibirsk National Research State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Канева М. А., Унтура Г. А. Эволюция теорий и эмпирических моделей взаимосвязи экономического роста, науки и инноваций (часть 1) // Мир экономики и управления. 2017. Т. 17, № 4. С. 5-21.
2. Barro R. J., Sala-i-Martin X. Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995. 539 p.
3. Коломак Е. А. Модели региональной политики: конвергенция или дивергенция // Вестн. НГУ. Серия: Социально-экономические науки. 2009. Т. 9, № 1. С. 113-120.
4. Sala-i-Martin X. Regional cohesion: evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence // European Economic Review. 1996. Vol. 40. P. 1325-1352.
5. Milanovic B. Worlds apart: inter-national and world inequality 1950˗2000. Washington: World Bank Publication, 2002.
6. Sokoloff K., Engerman S. Institutions, factor endowment, and paths of development in the New World // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2000. Vol. 14 (3). P. 217-232.
7. Harris R. Models of regional growth: past, present and future // Journal of Economic Surveys. 2011. Vol. 25 (5). P. 913-951.
8. Rodríguez-Pose A., Crescenzi R. Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe // Regional Studies. 2008. Vol. 42 (1). P. 51-67.
9. Rodgriguez-Pose A., Villareal Peralta E.M. Innovation and regional growth in Mexico: 20002010 // Growth and Change. 2015. Vol. 46 (2). P. 172-195.
10. Schurmann C., Talaat A. Towards a European peripherally index. Report for General Directorate XVI Regional Policy of the European Commission. November: 1-48. Dortmund: IRPUD, 2000.
11. Канева М. А., Унтура Г. А. Взаимосвязь НИОКР, перетоков знаний и динамики экономического роста регионов России // Регион: экономика и социология. 2017. № 1. С. 78-100.
12. Fagerberg J., Schrolec M. National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development // Research Policy. 2008. Vol. 37. P. 1417-1435.
13. Golichenko O. The methodology of national innovation system analysis, In Quality Innovation: knowledge, theory and practices. Eds. C. Jin, L. Al-Hakim. Hershey, PA: IGI Publ., 2013. P. 94-123.
14. Jaffe A. B. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profit and market share // American Economic Review. 1986. Vol. 76. P. 984-1001.
15. Audretsch D. B., Feldman M. P. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production // American Economic Review. 1996. Vol. 86 (4). P. 253-273.
16. Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth // The Bell Journal of Economics. 1979. Vol. 10 (1). P. 92-116.
17. Pakes A., Griliches Z. Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first look // R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984. P. 55-72.
18. Теплых Г. В. Производственная функция знаний фирмы: обзор эмпирических исследований // Экономическая наука современной России. 2016. Т. 1, № 72. С. 28-38.
19. Anselin L., Varga A., Acs Z. Local spillovers between university research and high technology innovations // Journal of Urban Economics. 1997. Vol. 42. P. 422-448.
20. Charlot S., Crescenzi R., Musolesi A. Econometric modelling of the regional knowledge production function in Europe // Journal of Economic Geography. 2015. Vol. 15 (6). P. 1227-1259.
21. Marrocu E., Paci R., Usai S. Proximity, networking and knowledge production in Europe: what lessons for innovation policy? // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2013. Vol. 80. P. 1484-1498.
22. Бабурин В. Л., Земцов С. П. Факторы патентной активности в регионах России // Мир экономики и управления. 2016. Т. 16, № 1. С. 86-100.
23. Changes in economic geography theory and dynamics of technological change. Handbook of Regional Science. Eds. R. Crescenzi, M. M. Fischer, P. Nijkamp. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2013. P. 649-666.
24. Лободина О. Н., Шмидт Ю. Д. Оценка влияния пространственных факторов на интенсивность инновационных процессов // Вестн. ТГЭУ. 2013. № 3. С. 20-30.
25. Айвазян С. А., Афанасьев М. Ю., Руденко В. А. Оценка эффективности регионов РФ на основе модели производственного потенциала с характеристиками готовности к инновациям // Экономика и математические методы. 2014. Т. 50, № 4. С. 34-70.
26. Chen D., Dahlman K. The knowledge economy, the KAM methodology and World Bank operations // Word Bank Institute working paper. 2005. No. 37256.
27. Романова О. А., Гребенкин А. В., Акбердина В. В. Влияние инновационной динамики на развитие региональной экономической системы // Регион: экономика и социология. 2011. № 1. С. 15-32.
28. Bush V. Science The Endless Frontier. Washington: The US Government Printing Office, 1945. 220 p.
29. Solow R. Contribution to the theory of economic growth // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1957. Vol. 70 (1). P. 65-94.
30. Rogers E. M. Diffusion of innovations. N. Y.: Free Press of Glencoe, 1962. 367 p.
31. Uzawa H. Optimal technical change in an aggregate model of economic growth // International Economic Review. 1965. Vol. 6 (1). P. 18-31.
32. Jacobs J. The economy of cities. New York: Random House, 1969. 288 p.
33. Lündvall B.-Å. Product innovation and user-producer interaction. Industrial development. Research Series 31. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press, 1985.
34. Romer P. M. Increasing returns and long-run growth // Journal of Political Economy. 1986. Vol. 94 (5). P. 1002-1037.
35. Lucas R. On the mechanics of economic development // Journal of Monetary Economics. 1988. Vol. 22. P. 3-42.
36. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1988. 284 p.
37. Grossman G. M., Helpman E. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991. 384 p.
38. Aghion P., Howitt P. A model of growth through creative destruction // Econometrica. 1992. Vol. 60 (2). P. 323-351.
39. Autant-Bernard C. Spatial econometrics of innovation: recent contributions and research prospective // Spatial Economic Analysis. 2012. Vol. 7 (4). P. 403-419.
40. Logical framework methodology. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2010, 112 p.
41. Kaneva M., Untura G. Innovation indicators and regional growth // Economic Change and Restructuring. 2017. Vol. 50 (2). P. 133-159.
42. Aldieri L., Kotsemir M. N., Vinci C. P. Knowledge spillover effects: empirical evidence from Russian regions // Quality and Quantity. 2017. DOI 10.1007/s11135-017-0624-2.
43. Полтерович В. М. Теория эндогенного экономического роста и уравнения математической физики // Журнал новой экономической ассоциации. 2017. № 2. С. 193-201.
44. Акаев А. А., Садовничий В. А. Замкнутая динамическая модель для описания и расчета длинной волны экономического развития Кондратьева // Н. Д. Кондратьев: кризисы и прогнозы в свете теории длинных волн. Взгляд из современности. М.: Учитель, 2017. С. 155-176.
Review
For citations:
Kaneva M.A., Untura G.A. EVOLUTION OF THEORIES AND EMPIRICAL MODELS OF A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMIC GROWTH, SCIENCE AND INNOVATIONS (PART 2). World of Economics and Management. 2018;18(1):5-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2018-18-1-5-17
Views:
197
Email this article 
