Preview

World of Economics and Management

Advanced search

Shame and Normative Expectations about Reading in Perception of Scientific Workers

https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2021-21-4-175-186

Abstract

The article attempts to consider emotional perception and normative orientation in reading with an emphasis on such emotions as shame. Reading is a significant part of the daily lives of researchers, and obviously there are a number of social norms around and about reading. In the course of the research, an assumption was made that the normative expectations relevant to the reader are able to create a ground for experiencing shame. Phenomenological analysis of interviews and focus group materials with researchers allowed us to identify reasons for shame about professional and leisure reading in relation to regulatory constraints, some explanations of this experience, as well as related features of motivation to read. The experience of shame in relation to reading comes from the perception of the researcher himself in the modification of reading and the corresponding normative expectations – so, the manifestation of shame was recorded in discussions about both work and leisure reading. It turned out that reading both scientific and leisure literature is perceived by researchers as their status duty, in this regard, its "inadequacy" becomes a key reason for experiencing shame.

About the Authors

E. M. Zhesko
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Russian Federation

Ella M. Zhesko, Master Student

Moscow



I. А. Chudova
Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation

Irina A. Chudova, Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor

WoS Research ID ABG-5979-2020, RSCI Author ID 705010, SPIN 7727-4459

Novosibirsk



References

1. Scherer K. R. What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 2005, no. 44 (4), pp. 695–729.

2. Bericat E. The sociology of emotions: Four decades of progress. Current Sociology, 2015, no. 64 (3), pp. 491–513.

3. Simonova O. A. A Sociological Study of Emotion in Contemporary American Sociology: Conceptual Issues. Sociologicheskij ezhegodnik, 2009, no. 1, pp. 199–225. (in Russ.)

4. Hochschild A. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Moscow, “Delo”, RANEPA, 2019, 256 p. (in Russ.)

5. Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Trans. by M. S. Dobryakova. Moscow, 2001. (in Russ.) URL: https://www.hse.ru/data/2011/11/15/1272895702/Goffman_stigma.pdf (accessed 13.09.2021).

6. Benedict R. The Chrysanthemum and the sword. Patterns of Japanese culture. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2004, 256 p. (in Russ.)

7. Norman R. Practical Reasons and the Redundancy of Motives Source. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2001, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3–22.

8. Melenteva Yu. P. Theory of reading. Moscow, Nauka, 2015, 230 p. (in Russ.)

9. Schutz A. Concept and theory formation in the social sciences. In: Amerikanskaya sociologicheskaya mysl': teksty. Moscow, 1994, pp. 526–541. (in Russ.)

10. Cervetti G., Pearson P. D. Reading, Writing, and Thinking Like a Scientist Source. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 2012, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 580–586.

11. Sokolov M. Russian Sociology after 1991: The Intellectual and Institutional Dynamics of the “Poor Science”. Laboratorium. Zhurnal social'nykh issledovaniy, 2009, no. 1, pp. 20–57. (in Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Zhesko E.M., Chudova I.А. Shame and Normative Expectations about Reading in Perception of Scientific Workers. World of Economics and Management. 2021;21(4):175-186. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2021-21-4-175-186

Views: 367


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0429 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5375 (Online)