Nuances in theory and practice of the Eurasian integration concept
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2020-20-3-139-147
Abstract
The processes of Eurasian economic integration development have not been effective as expected. One of the factors creating contradictions and certain imbalance of interests between the member states of the Eurasian economic community is the increasing prevalence of political aspects over the economic ones, which was clearly manifested in the EAEU development strategy until 2025. In the author’s opinion, the reason lies in a lack of forecasting and analytical tools efficiency by which decisions are taken in supranational bodies of the association. It seems appropriate to develop a set of tools based on the complex of models taken from optimizing cross-sectoral interregional model (OCIM) developed in the 1960s in the Institute of economics and industrial engineering (Novosibirsk). This model is widely used nowadays, as it allows to increase the level of scientific foundation in the decision-making for the further development of Eurasian integration.
References
1. Klotsvog F., Sukhotin A., Chernova L. Forecasting the economic development of Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine within the framework of a single economic space. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2009, no. 4, p. 26–36 (in Russ.)
2. A comprehensive assessment of the macroeconomic effect of various forms of deep economic cooperation between Ukraine and the countries of the Customs Union and the Common Economic Space within the framework of the EAEU. Final scientific and technical report. St. Petersburg, Center for Integration Studies, 2012, 168 p. (in Kaz.)
3. Podkina K. Yu. EAEU: Analysis of the current state and perspective vectors of cooperation. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2019, no. 9 (431). Economic Sciences, iss. 66, p. 217–224 (in Russ.)
4. Prokofieva E. The impact of integration processes within the EAEU on the formation of sustainable competitive advantages of the national economies. KANT, 2017, no. 3 (24), р. 186–188. (in Russ.)
5. Drobot E. V., Kostyleva S. O. Evaluation methods of economic integration consequences for the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union. Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo, 2017, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 23–40. (in Russ.)
6. Morozova G. V. Russia within the Euroasian integration. Molodoy uchenyy, 2015, no. 3, p. 456–459. (in Russ.).
7. Suspitsyn S. The genesis of the SIRENA project: from concept to multi-level forecasting technology. Novosibirsk, IEIE SB RAS, 2016. (in Russ.) URL: https://www.ieie.su/assets/granberg2016/ files/suspicin.pdf
8. Region system optimization. Novosibirsk, IEIE SB RAS, 2010, 632 p. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kusainov K. Nuances in theory and practice of the Eurasian integration concept. World of Economics and Management. 2020;20(3):139-147. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2020-20-3-139-147
Views:
107
Email this article 
