On some dangerous practices for supporting public sector worker
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2020-20-3-70-83
Abstract
The article studies the correctness of setting goals and establishing norms in the regional segment of social support for the population and some of the consequences of this issue. As an example, the author examines the decrees of the Governor of the Irkutsk Region on social support for public sector employees issued in the period 2017-2019. An analysis of the provisions set forth in the decrees and the approved procedures for submission of lump sum payments highlights the non-traditional methods of organizing transfers of budget funds to employees of the state and municipal organization in the region. In addition to giving budget workers the right to receive a lump sum payment on professional holidays, the decrees of the Governor of the Irkutsk Region in violation of federal law exempted these payments in the amount of RUB 1.5 billion from taxation. According to the author, the motive to avoid generally accepted mechanisms for fulfilling budget expenditure commitments could be a desire to receive unreasonable tax benefits for the regional budget by reducing payments to budgets of other levels and extra-budgetary funds. The obtained results of the research can be used to develop the guidelines for limiting the regional rule-making in the field of social support based on subjective understanding of unreasonable norms-goals.
About the Author
R. ErzheninRussian Federation
Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor
References
1. Kizhikina V. V. Evolution of the social protection system in Russia (comparison
2. with European countries). Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2013,
3. no. 3 (23), p. 80–94. (in Russ.)
4. Khairullaev R. T. Government measures of social support for the population of
5. Great Britain. Journal Scyth., 2019, no. 11 (39), p. 373–377. (in Russ.)
6. Baranova I. V., Cyprus Yu. A. Social support of the population as a priority
7. area of state social policy. Siberian Financial School, 2014, no. 1 (102), p. 3–9.(in Russ.)
8. Gorina E. A. Transformation of social support for the population in the regions of
9. Russia: directions and priorities. Journal of Social Policy Research, 2019, vol. 17,
10. no. 2, p. 163–176. (in Russ.)
11. Gracheva O. Place of social support of the population in regional social policy:
12. methodological aspect. Man and labor, 2008, no. 1, p. 9–12. (in Russ.)
13. Bolshakov S. N., Manaenkova Yu. N., Bolshakova Yu. M. Assessment of the
14. effectiveness of implementing program-targeted methods for solving socioeconomic problems at the current stage. State and municipal administration. Scientific notes, 2017, no. 4, p. 13–23. (in Russ.)
15. Baranov A. V. On the effectiveness of the application of norms-objectives in the
16. legal regulation mechanism. In: Proceedings Problems of law enforcement in modern Russia. Omsk, Publ. House OmSU, 2016. Disc (CD-ROM) (in Russ.)
17. Kolchina O. A., Grezina M. A., Rakitina M. S. Directions of reform of the budget sector in the system of socio-economic development of the region. News of the
18. SFU. Technical sciences, 2013, no. 6 (143), p. 41–47. (in Russ.)
19. Fedorova M. Yu. Social support in the system of social protection of the population: concept and legal nature. Russian yearbook of labor law, 2009, no. 4, p. 577–591. (in Russ.)
20. Ekimov A. I. The category of goals in the science of law. In: Philosophical problems of the state and law. Lenin ideas and issues of methodology in legal science.
21. Ltningrad, LSU Press, 1970, p. 53. (in Russ.)
22. Scott, Colin David. Standard-Setting in Regulatory Regimes (April 16, 2009). In:
23. University College Dublin Law Research Paper, no. 07/2009. DOI 10.2139/
24. ssrn.1393647
Review
For citations:
Erzhenin R. On some dangerous practices for supporting public sector worker. World of Economics and Management. 2020;20(3):70-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2020-20-3-70-83