Construction and Use of the Regional Input-Output Model with Environmental and Economic Development Blocks
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2020-20-3-27-47
Abstract
The paper analyzes environmental-economics models developed by foreign and Russian scientists. The first attempts to combine both economic and environmental issues in mathematical modeling were made in the 1960s, with most of them been theoretical due to lack of necessary data. With the development of modeling approaches, following on Wassily Leontief’s models, an environmental block has been included into input-output models. However, most of the existing models can hardly be applied to practice due to lack of statistical data and the absence of inter-industry approach. Even today the main restricting factor for these models to be used in practice is still limited availability of information, including not only economic but also environmental data, which is especially critical for regional researches, as the number of statistical indicators for the regions is much lower than at the macro level.
The article provides mathematical description of the input-output model with an environmental block. The model is developed at the Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of the Siberian Branch of the RAS in collaboration with the Novosibirsk State University. The model can be used for regional researches, given the input-output tables for the region is available.
Keywords
Regional input-output models,
interindustry analysis,
environmental development,
environmental issues
Supporting agencies: The study was supported by RFBR, project number 20-010-00414 А
About the Authors
А. Baranov
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of SB RAS, Novosibirsk State University (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
doctor of sciences (economics), deputy director, head of chair
V. Pavlov
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Sciences (Technics), Professor, Chief Researcher
T. Tagaeva
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of SB RAS, Novosibirsk State University (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
doctor of sciences (economics), leading researcher, professor
Y. Slepenkova
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of SB RAS, Novosibirsk State University (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
candidate of sciences (economics), researcher
References
1. Ayres U., Kneese A. Production, Consumption and Externalities. American Economic Review. 1969. № 3 (Vol. 59): 289–298.
2. Daly H. On Economics as a Life Science. The Journal of Political Economy. 1968. № 3 (Vol. 76): 392–406.
3. Isard W. Ecologic-Economic Analysis for Regional Development. N.Y.: The Free
4. Press, 1972.. 270 p
5. Leontiev V., Ford D. Mezhotraslevoy analiz vozdeystviya struktury ekonomiki na okruzhayushchuyu sredu // Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody. 1972. T. 8 (3).
6. p. 370–399. (in Russ.)
7. Suslov N. I. Proekt OON «Budushchee mirovoy ekonomiki»: chto ne sbylos'?
8. EKO. 2011. № 12. p. 82–101. (in Russ.)
9. Duchin F., Lange G. Strategies of Environmentally Sound Development: an Input-Output Analysis. N. Y.: Institute for Economic Analysis, 1989. 375 p.
10. Tsukui J., Murakany Y. Turnpike Optimality in Input-Output Systems: Theory
11. and Application for Planning. – N.Y.: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1977. 217 p.
12. Nansai K., Kagawa S. et al. Improving the Completeness of Product Carbon
13. Footprints using a Global Link Input-Output Model: the Case of Japan. Economic
14. Systems Research. 2009. № 3 (Vol. 21): 267–290
15. Johnsen T. Modelling of Future Emissions to Air in Norway. Norway: Central
16. Bureau of Statistics, 1989. 117 p.
17. Pan X., Kraines S. Environmental Input-Output Models for Life-Cycle Analysis.
18. Asia-Pacific Research Center. USA: Stanford University Press, 2000. 318 p.
19. Hoerner A., Barrett J., Meade D. A Sustainable Economy: Analysis of a Comprehensive Approach to Climate Change and Energy Policy. In: Proceedings XIV International Conference on Input-Output Techniques at the University of Quebec in Montreal, Canada, 2002, October. Montreal: University Press, 2002: 10–15.
20. Boratyński J., Plich M., Przybyliński M. Modeling Economic and Social Impacts
21. of Energy Prices in the Polish Economy. In: Recent Developments in INFORUMtype Modeling / ed. by Plich M., Przybyliński M. Poland: University of Lodz, 2007. 217 p.
22. Richter J. The Statistical Environment of Inforum Models. In: Energy Policy and
23. International Competitiveness / ed. by M. Grassini, R. Bardazzi. Firenze: Firenze
24. University Press, 2009. 243 p.
25. Keuning S.J., Steenge A.E. Environmental Extensions of National Accounts: the
26. NAMEA Framework. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 1999. № 1
27. (Vol. 10): 3–13.
28. Bouwmeester M. C., Oosterhaven J., Duchin F. Consumption-based environmental accounting of CO2 emissions and water use in a world-wide multi-regional input-output framework. Materials of ISEE Conference 2010. Germany: Press of Carl von Ossietzky Oldenburg University, 2010. P. 227.
29. Bruckner M., Wiebe K., Lutz C., Giljum S. CO2 embodied in international
30. trade – Evidence for carbon leakage between 1995 and 2005. Materials of ISEE Conference 2010. Germany: Press of Carl von Ossietzky Oldenburg University, 2010. P. 227.
31. Marin G. Sector CO2 and SOx Emissions Efficiency and Productivity: Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Estimates using the Italian NAMEA. Materials of ISEE
32. Conference 2010. Oldenburg: Press of Carl von Ossietzky Oldenburg University,
33. 226 p.
34. Plich M. Environmental Extension of Inforum-Type Model for Poland with Use of NAMEA. In: Structural Changes, International Trade and Multisectoral Modelling. Florence: Firenze University Press, 2008. 318 p.
35. Antonovskiy M. Ya., Litvin V. A., Ter-Mikaelyan M. T. Metodologiya postroeniya balansovykh ekologo-ekonomicheskikh modeley. In: Problemy ekologicheskogo monitoringa i modelirovaniya ekosistem. L.: Gidrometeoizdat, 1980. 218 p. (in Russ.)
36. Gofman K. G., Gusev A. A. Ekologicheskie izderzhki i kontseptsiya ekonomicheskogo optimuma kachestva okruzhayushchey prirodnoy sredy. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody. 1981. T. 17 (3). p. 515–527. (in Russ.)
37. Ushakov E. P., Zakirov N. K. et al. Ekonomicheskie problemy optimizatsii
38. vodookhrannoy deyatel'nosti. M.: Nauka, 1987. 176 p. (in Russ.)
39. Lvovskaya K. B. O vliyanii sredozashchitnoy strategii na ekologo-ekonomicheskoe razvitie. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody. 1988. T. 24(3). p. 438–446. (in Russ.)
40. Dubovskiy S. V., Mironychev A. F., Osipov S. N. Ekologicheskie posledstviya
41. al'ternativ sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii v perekhodnyy period.
42. Problemy okruzhayushchey sredy i prirodnykh resursov. M.: VINITI. 1994. № 5. p. 73–74. (in Russ.)
43. Safonov P. I. Dynamic Ecology-Economy Interactions Modelling: Some Experience and Perspectives of Application in Russian and German Context. International Conference "Ecology, Society, Economy". Versailles, France, May, 1996. P. 118–204.
44. Lyapina A. A. Ekonomika, ekologiya, zatraty. M.: MSU, TEIS, 1997. 95 p.
45. (in Russ.)
46. Ivleva E.S. Ekologicheskiy faktor ekonomicheskogo rosta. SPb.: publ. SPbGUEF,
47. 100 p. (in Russ.)
48. Sharov S. Yu. Indikatory ustoychivogo razvitiya Rossii (ekologo-ekonomicheskie
49. aspekty). M., 2001. 220 p. (in Russ.)
50. Kudryavtseva O. V. Ekologicheskaya effektivnost' na makrourovne: potoki
51. resursov, model' mezhotraslevogo balansa i eksport vody v rossiyskoy ekonomike.
52. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody. T. 44 (4). 2008. p. 39–48. (in Russ.)
53. Ryumina E. V. Ekonomicheskiy analiz ushcherba ot ekologicheskikh narusheniy.
54. M.: Nauka, 2009. 331 p. (in Russ.)
55. Modelirovanie sotsio-ekologo-ekonomicheskoy sistemy regiona. M.: Nauka, 2001.
56. p. (in Russ.)
57. Gurman V. I., Matveev G. A., Trushkova E. A. Sotsio-ekologo-ekonomicheskaya model' regiona v parallel'nykh vychisleniyakh. Upravlenie bol'shimi sistemami. 2011. № 32. P. 109–130. (in Russ.)
58. Rogge N., De Jaeger S., Lavigne C. Waste Performance of NUTS 2-regions in the EU: A Conditional Directional Distance Benefit-of-the-Doubt Model. Ecological
59. Economics. 2017. Vol. 139. P. 19–32.
60. Abbott A., Nandeibam S., O'Shea L. The Displacement Effect of Convenience:
61. The Case of Recycling. Ecological Economics. 2017. Vol. 136. P. 159–168.
62. Fremstad A. Does Craigslist Reduce Waste? Evidence from California and Florida. Ecological Economics. 2017. Vol. 132. P. 135–143.
63. Askhakova F. Kh. Reshenie plokho obuslovlennoy modeli, dvoystvennoy k modeli Leont'eva-Forda, uchityvayushchey utilizatsiyu vrednykh otkhodov. Vestnik
64. Astrakhanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: upravlenie, vychislitel'naya tekhnika i informatika. 2016. № 3. p. 87–93.
65. Baranov A. O., Gilmundinov V. M., Pavlov V. N. Issledovanie ekonomiki Rossii s ispol'zovaniem mezhotraslevykh modeley. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2001. 198 p. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Baranov А., Pavlov V., Tagaeva T., Slepenkova Y. Construction and Use of the Regional Input-Output Model with Environmental and Economic Development Blocks. World of Economics and Management. 2020;20(3):27-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2020-20-3-27-47
Views:
170
Email this article 
