Analysis of the strength of patents of russian research institutions
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2020-20-2-68-83
Abstract
This paper study problem of the efficiency of management of intellectual property (IP) of research institutes and universities, proposes criteria and method of an assessment of the patent strength. The basic patent index and the average strength of patents were calculated for the institutes of SB RAS, Novosibirsk State University (NSU), Indian Institutes of Technology Delhi, and PJSC “Sibur Holding”. The results showed that the IP of institutes and NSU has a low level of protection, which explains its low demand in the market. The average strength of patents and the basic patent index are the indicators that can be recommended for inclusion into the reporting indices of the efficiency of management of IP of research institutes and universities.
Supporting agencies: This work was supported by the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Interdisciplinary Integration Project 50.3).
About the Authors
L. Perepechko
Kutateladze Institute of Thermophysics SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
candidate of sciences (Physics and Mathematics), Head of
the Department of Innovative, Applied and Foreign Economic Activity
I. Sharina
Kutateladze Institute of
Thermophysics SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
ead engineer on patent and inventive work
Н. Гришина
Kutateladze Institute of
Thermophysics SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
engineer
A. Rakhmanova
Kutateladze Institute of
Thermophysics SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
engineer
References
1. Perepechko L. N. Intellectual property management of state research institutes:theoretical, methodological and organizational aspect. Novosibirsk, TsRNS Publ., 2017, 176 p. (in Russ.)
2. Yanykina N. O. Strategic IPR management: specifics of scientific educational complex. University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2011, no. 3, p. 37–44. (in Russ.)
3. Vidyakina O. Key performance indicators for university’s innovation ecosystem. Intellectual property. Industrial property, 2017, no. 9, p. 31–38. (in Russ.)
4. Smirnova V. R. Foundations of the institutional and innovation ecosystem in universities and research institutions. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Intellectual Property Policy of Universities and Research Institutions. Omsk, March 26–27, 2019. (in Russ.)
5. Shoulgin D. B., Kortov S. V., Terlyga N. G. The experience of forming intellectual property management system at UrFU. University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2016, no. 2, p. 72–83. (in Russ.)
6. Loseva O. V., Bakulina A. A. The system of evaluation and commercialization of research results in scientific organizations and higher educational institutions. In: Digest of scientific life of the Financial University. April – June. 2019, iss. 3, p. 87. (in Russ.)
7. Seliverstov Yu. I. About Evaluation of Efficiency of Savings and Utilization of Enterprise Intellectual Property. Kreativnaya ekonomika, 2012, vol. 6 (7), p. 86–91. (in Russ.)
8. Park W. International patent protection: 1960–2005. Research Policy, 2008, no. 37, p. 761–766.
9. Ginarte J. C., Park W. G. Determinants of patent rights: a cross-national study. Research Policy, 1997, no. 26, p. 283–301.
10. Haber S. H. Patents and the Wealth of Nations (May 6, 2016). George Mason Law Review, 2016, vol. 23, no. 4.
11. Albert G. Z. Hu and I. P. L. Png. Patent rights and economic growth: evidence from cross-country panels of manufacturing industries. Oxford Econ. Papers, 2013, no. 675.
12. Park W., Ginarte J. C. Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 1997, no. 15, p. 51–61.
13. Novelli E. An examination of the antecedents and implications of patent scope. Research Policy, 2015, no. 44, p. 493–507. DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.005
14. Novelli E. What determines the strength of a patent. In: Cass Business School, 2018.
15. D’ Agostiono Richard J. US2008154767A1 “Method for assessing the strength of patent portfolios and valuating them for purposes of monetization”. 2008.
16. Voronov V. S. Indicators of corporate patent portfolio value and their role in formation of new group of financial ratios. Financial Analytics: Science and Experience, 2012, no. 39 (129), p. 15–23. (in Russ.)
17. Barney J. A. A Study of patent mortality rates: using statistical survival analysis to
18. rotate and value patent assets. AIPLA Quarterly Journal, 2002, vol. 30, no. 3.
Review
For citations:
Perepechko L., Sharina I., , Rakhmanova A. Analysis of the strength of patents of russian research institutions. World of Economics and Management. 2020;20(2):68-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2020-20-2-68-83
Views:
166
Email this article 
