Semiotics and Moment Approach as New Theoretical and Methodological Bases for the Study of the Labour Sphere (Part I Theoretical)
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2024-24-4-207-226
Abstract
The article proposes a theoretical and methodological approach to the study of the sphere of industrial labour by relying on the semiotic model of social space, communication and labour. In the space of the key socio-philosophical and socio-semiotic theories of Kristeva, Rorty and Lotman the mechanism of overcoming labour alienation by design engineers and employees of Russian industrial enterprises is argued and investigated. It is interpreted as a process defined by the framework of everyday language and constituted within the discursive practices of employees at different levels of the social structure of industrial enterprises. It is shown that overcoming objective alienation is possible at certain moments associated with the transformation (shift) of the institutional boundaries of both the language game and the corresponding them at the level of social realities of interaction between labour regimes in industrial production. For this purpose, for the first time in Russian sociology, the method of research of moments (moment analysis) is used.
About the Author
V. Yu. KombarovRussian Federation
Vyacheslav Yu. Kombarov, Candidate of Science (in Sociology), Leading Engineer
Scopus AuthorlD: 36682560100 ResearcherlD: U-1415-2017
Novosibirsk
References
1. Modemmicropaleontology.ProceedingsoftheXVAll-Russianmicropaleontological meeting (12-16 September 2012, Gelendzhik). Moscow, 2012, 520 p.
2. Kristeva J. Dostoevsky, or The Flood of language. Columbia University Press, 2022.
3. Marcuse G. Eros and Civilisation. One-Dimensional Man: A Study of the Ideology ofDeveloped Industrial Society. Moscow, AST publ., 2002.
4. Rorty R. Randomness, Irony and Solidarity. Moscow, Russian Phenomenological Society, 1996, 282 p.
5. Sociology: encyclopaedia. Minsk: Interpresservice; Book House, 2003. (in Russ.)
6. History of Philosophy: Encyclopaedia. Minsk, 2002. (in Russ.)
7. Kristeva Y. Semiotics: Studies on Semanalysis. Moscow, Academic Project, 2013.
8. Derrida J. On Grammatology. Moscow, Ad Marginem, 2000. 512 c.
9. Lotman Yu. M. Culture and explosion. Moscow, AST publ., 2019,256 p (in Russ.)
10. Keady J., Campbell S., Clark A., Dowlen R., Elvish R., Jones L., Williams S. Re-thinking and re-positioning ‘being in the moment’ within a continuum of moments: Introducing a new conceptual framework for dementia studies. Ageing & Society, 2022, vol. 42 (3), pp. 681-702.
11. Gabb, J., & Fink, J. Telling Moments and Everyday Experience: Multiple Methods Research on Couple Relationships and Personal Lives. Sociology, 2015, vol. 49 (5), pp. 970-987.
12. Pushkin A. Eugene Onegin. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya Literatura, 1984. 256 p. (in Russ.)
13. Georgakopoulou A. Sharing the moment as small stories. The interplay between practices & affordances in the social media-curation of lives. Narrative Inquiry, 2017, vol. 27, iss. 2, pp. 311-333.
14. Pound P., Britten N., Morgan M., Yardley L., Pope C., Daker-White G., & Tipper B. Moments of being and ordinary human-animal encounters. Virginia WoolfMiscellany, 2013, vol. 84, pp. 14-16.
15. Mason, J. Affinities: Potent connections in personal life. London, John Wiley & Sons, 2018.
Review
For citations:
Kombarov V.Yu. Semiotics and Moment Approach as New Theoretical and Methodological Bases for the Study of the Labour Sphere (Part I Theoretical). World of Economics and Management. 2024;24(4):207-226. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2024-24-4-207-226