Preview

World of Economics and Management

Advanced search

Assessment of Possible Parameters of Interaction between Mechanical Engineering and Metallurgy in Russia in the Perspective up to 2035

https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2024-24-4-121-140

Abstract

The article provides an analysis of the export and import of mechanical engineering and metallurgical products - with details on certain areas of production - based on which a conclusion is made about the high degree of import dependence of mechanical engineering and the export-oriented nature of metallurgy, which led to a “desynchronization” of the results of the functioning of these types of economic activity for Russia: domestic metallurgy can be considered the basis for Russian mechanical engineering based on the results of functioning in the period up to2022 with a very big stretch. An attempt was made to assess the possible parameters of the functioning of mechanical engineering and metallurgy in Russia during the implementation of the updated Consolidated Strategy for the Development of the Manufacturing Industry until 2030 and for the period up to 2035. The assessment of the parameters is based on the premise that an increase in the production of mechanical engineering products will accordingly cause an increase in metallurgical production in accordance with the indicators of the Consolidated Strategy. According to the Consolidated Strategy, mechanical engineering, as the main producer of high-tech products, should increase its production volume by 2.5 times by 2035. In accordance with this, metallurgical production should increase, while maintaining the basic level of intermediate consumption of metallurgical products in mechanical engineering. Based on these indicators, using the table of use of domestic products in basic prices, possible parameters of future changes in the interaction of metallurgy and mechanical engineering were determined. Hypothetically, an increase in the output of metallurgical products should require 2.6 trillion rubles of investment in metallurgical production and 5.4 trillion rubles in mechanical engineering.

About the Authors

A. V. Sokolov
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS ;Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation

Aleksandr V. Sokolov, Candidate of Siences (Economics), Associate Professor, Leading Researcher

Scopus AuthorlD: 57216495452 RSCI: 619163

Novosibirsk



V. A. Bazhanov
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS
Russian Federation

Viktor A. Bazhanov, Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Leading Researcher

Scopus AuthorlD: 57215935615 RSCI: 72833

Novosibirsk



References

1. Sukharev О. S. Structural analysis of intersectoral interactions in the economy: improving financial and investment institutions. In: Evolutionary Economics and Finance: Innovation, Competition and Economic Growth. Collection of papers of the Vlll international symposium on evolutionary economics. Moscow: Institute of Economics RAS, 2010. (inRuss.)

2. Shirov A. A. Using input-output tables tojustify decisions in the field of economic policy. Problems of Forecasting, 2018, no. 6, pp. 12-24. URL: https://cyberlenin-ka.ru/article/n/ispolzovanie-tablits-zatraty-vypusk-dlya-obosnovaniya-resheniy-v-oblasti-ekonomicheskoy-politiki/viewer3 (in Russ.)

3. Ksenofontov M. Yu., Shirov A. A., Polzikov D. A., Yantovsky A. A. Assessment of multiplier effects in the Russian economy based on input-output tables. Fore-castingProblems, 2018, vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 3-14. (inRuss.)

4. Bazhanov V. A., Oreshko 1.1., Veselaya L. S. Assessment of export opportunities of mechanical engineering in Russia. World of Economics and Management, 2020, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 5-19. (inRuss.)

5. Strizhkova L. A., Selivanova M. V. Application of the inter-industry balance method in the practice of strategic planning. URL: https://bookonlime.ru/lec-ture/9-primenenie-metoda-mezhotraslevogo-balansa-v-praktike-strategichesko-go-planirovaniya (in Russ.)

6. Rose A., Kasler C. Input-Output Breakdown Structure Analysis: A Critical Assessment. Allegheny College, Meadville, PA, 16335, USA. P. 33-62. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09535319600000003

7. Baranov E. F., Elsakova A. V., Korneva E. S., Staritsyna E. A. Decomposition Analysis of the Impact of Demand on Economic Growth (Based on Input-Output Tables). Voprosy statistiki, 2016, no. 10, pp. 44-56. URL: https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2016-0-10-44-56 (inRuss.)

8. Kalinin А. М., Koroteev S. S., Krupin A. A., Nefedov А. V. Technological import dependence of the Russian economy: assessment using input-output tables. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev., 2021, vol. 32(1), pp. 52-58. DOI: 10.1134/S107570072101007X (inRuss.)

9. Sanatina Yu. How to overcome Russia’s dependence on machine tool imports // Rossiyskaya Gazeta - Economy of the Ural Federal District. 12.04.2023. URL: https://rg.ru/2023/04/12/reg-urfo/zapustit-zavod-zavodov.html (date of access: 15.08.2024). (inRuss.)


Review

For citations:


Sokolov A.V., Bazhanov V.A. Assessment of Possible Parameters of Interaction between Mechanical Engineering and Metallurgy in Russia in the Perspective up to 2035. World of Economics and Management. 2024;24(4):121-140. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2024-24-4-121-140

Views: 65


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0429 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5375 (Online)