Влияние корпоративного управления, структуры собственности и финансовой архитектуры на стратегическую эффективность компаний
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2023-23-4-136-149
Аннотация
Статья содержит комплексный анализ сложной взаимосвязи между корпоративным управлением, структурой собственности, финансовой структурой и стратегической эффективностью компаний. Общие выводы определяются на основе всестороннего анализа существующих исследований. Результаты подчеркивают значимость независимого комитета по аудиту, разделения ролей председателя совета директоров (СД) и генерального директора, а также частоты проведения заседаний совета директоров на эффективность деятельности компании. Кроме того, анализируется влияние на различные переменные эффективности состава и размера совета директоров и комитетов по корпоративному управлению. Исследование также подчеркивает необходимость учета нескольких аспектов при оценке эффективности компаний и устанавливает U-образную связь между долей собственности компании в руках ее менеджеров или членов СД и эффективностью компании. Будущие исследования должны продолжить изучение этих аспектов экономического развития с учетом его разных периодов и стадий, а также специфики развитых и развивающихся стран.
Об авторе
Н. А. Якимов
Новосибирский государственный университет
Россия
Россия
Никита Андреевич Якимов, аспирант экономического факультета,
Новосибирск.
Список литературы
1. Filatotchev I., Boyd B. (2009). Taking stock of corporate governance research while looking to the future, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 257-265.
2. Jensen M., 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems, Journal of Finance, 48, 831-880.
3. O’Connell V., Cramer N., (2010). The relationship between firm performance and board characteristics in Ireland, European Management Journal, 28, 387-399.
4. Kata H., Tomar S., (2010). Corporate governance practices in Indian firms, Journal of Management and Organization, 16 (2), 266-279.
5. Palaniappan G., (2017) Determinants of corporate financial performance relating to board characteristics of corporate governance in Indian manufacturing industry: An empirical study, European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 26(1), 67-85.
6. Sheikh, N.A, Wang, Z. and Khan, S. (2013). The impact of internal attributes of corporate governance on firm performance-Evidence from Pakistan, International Journal of Commerce and Management, 23(1), 38-55.
7. Ho S., Wong K. (2001). A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 10, 139–156.
8. Rahman R., Mahamod M., (2008). The effects of external monitors on firm performance and corporate governance disclosure level: Malaysian evidence, International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 3 (9), 173-183.
9. Vafeas N., (1999). The Nature of board nominating committees and their role in corporate governance, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 26 (1).
10. Rosenstein S., Wyatt J., (1990). Outside directors, board independence and shareholder wealth, Journal of Financial Economics, 26, 175-191.
11. Fama E., Jensen M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control, Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–326.
12. Forker J. (1992). Corporate governance and disclosure quality, Accounting and Business Research, 22 (86), 111–124.
13. Byrd J., Hickman K. (1992). Do outside directors monitor managers? Evidence from tender offer bids, Journal of Financial Economics, 32, 195-221.
14. Gaur, S.S., Bathula, H. and Singh, D. (2015). Ownership concentration, board characteristics and firm performance, IManagement Decision, 53 (5), 911 –931.
15. Arora, A., Sharma, C. (2016). Corporate governance and firm performance in developing countries: evidence from India, Corporate Governance, 16(2), 420 –43.
16. Ujunwa, A. (2012). Board characteristics and the financial performance of Nigerian quoted firms, The international journal of business in society, 12(5), 656-674
17. Shivdasani, A., Yermack D., (1998). CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: an empirical analysis, Journal of Finance, vol. 54 (5), pp. 1829-1853.
18. Степанова А., (2009). Влияние финансовой архитектуры на ее стратегическую эффективность, Финансы и кредит 44, 38-46.
19. Ameer R., Ramli F. (2010). A new perspective on board composition and firm performance in an emerging market, Corporate Governance, 10 (5), 647-661.
20. Ting P., Liao Y., (2010). Why do the controlling owners select an affiliated board? Evidence from Taiwan banks, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 56, 124-139.
21. Arosa B., Iturralde T. (2010). Outsiders on the board of directors and firm performance: Evidence from Spanish non-listed family firms, Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1, 236-245.
22. Wang Y., Oliver J., (2009). Board composition and firm performance variance: Australian evidence, Accounting Research Journal, 22 (2), 196 – 212.
23. Adams, R. B. & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94 (2), 291-309.
24. Pi L., Timme S., (1993). Corporate control and bank efficiency, Journal of Banking and Finance, 17, 515-530.
25. Baliga, B., Moyer, R., Rao, R. (1996). CEO duality and firm performance: What's the fuss? Strategic Management Journal, 17, 41-53.
26. Nas, T.I., Kalaycioglu, O. (2016). The effects of the board composition, board size and CEO duality on export performance: evidence from Turkey, Management Research Review, 39 (11), 1374-1409.
27. Hassan, M.K., Halbouni, S.S. (2013). Corporate governance, economic turbulence and financial performance of UAE listed firms, Studies in Economics and Finance, 30(2), 118-138.
28. Brickley J.A., Coles J.L., Jarrel C. (1997). Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and chairman of the board, Journal of Corporate Finance, 3(3), 189-220.
29. Collier P. (1993). Factors affecting the formation of audit committees in major UK listed companies, Accounting and Business Research, 23 (91), 421–430.
30. McMullen D., (1996). Audit committee performance: an investigation of the consequences associated with audit committee, Journal of Theory and Practice, 15 (1), 87–103.
31. Beasley M. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud, Accounting Review, 71 (4), 443-465.
32. Petra S., (2005). Do outside independent directors strengthen corporate boards? Corporate Governance, 5 (1), 55-64.
33. Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53, 113–142.
34. Sun J., Cahan S., Emanuel D., (2009). Compensation committee governance quality, chief executive officer stock option grants, and future firm performance, Journal of Banking and Finance, 33 (8), 1507-1519.
35. Ellstrand A., Catherine M., Johnson J., Dalton D. (1998). Governance by committee: The influence of committee composition on corporate performance, Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, Conference paper, 1, 488-490.
36. Setia-Atmaja L., (2009). Governance mechanisms and firm value: The impact of ownership concentration and dividends, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(6), 694-709.
37. Boyd B. (1994). Board control and CEO compensation, Strategic Management Journal, 15, 335-344.
38. Buallay, A., Hamdan, A., and Zureigat, Q. (2017). Corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. In Australasian accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(1), 78-98.
39. Huse M. (2007). Boards, Governance and value creation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Morck R., Shleifer A., Vishny R., (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis, Journal of Financial Economics, No. 20, 293—315.
41. Holderness C., Kroszner R., Sheehan D. (1999). Were the good old days that good? Changes in managerial stock ownership since the great depression, Journal of Finance, 54(2), 435–469.
42. Shivdasani, A., (1993). Board composition, ownership structure, and hostile takeovers, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16, 167-198.
43. Ivashkovskaya I., Stepanova A., (2010). Does strategic corporate performance depend on corporate financial architecture? Empirical study of European, Russia and other emerging market’s firms, Journal of management and governance, 1-14.
44. Myers, S., (1999). Financial architecture, European Financial Management 5, 133–141.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Якимов Н.А. Влияние корпоративного управления, структуры собственности и финансовой архитектуры на стратегическую эффективность компаний. Мир экономики и управления. 2023;23(4):136-149. https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2023-23-4-136-149
For citation:
Yakimov N.A. Influence of Corporate Governance, Ownership Structure and Financial Architecture on the Strategic Effectiveness of the Company. World of Economics and Management. 2023;23(4):136-149. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2023-23-4-136-149
Просмотров:
229
Послать статью по эл. почте 
