Transport project appraisal: experience and problems (part 2)
Abstract
Prevalent in the world approaches to appraisal of large-scale investment projects aimed at construction of transport systems are considered. This part of the article discusses the multi-criteria and macroeconomic evaluations. The issues of ex-post analysis are discussed as well.
About the Author
K. P. Gluschenko
Институт экономики и организации промышленного производства СО РАН, Новосибирск
Новосибирский национальный исследовательский государственный университет, Новосибирск
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Глущенко К. П. Оценка эффективности транспортных проектов: опыт и проблемы (часть 1) // Вестн. Новосиб. гос. ун-та. Серия: Социально-экономические науки. 2011. Т. 11, вып. 4. С. 93–107.
2. Economic Evaluation Methods for Road Projects in PIARC Member Countries. World Road Association, 2004. URL: http://publications.piarc.org/ressources/publications_files/1/628-09-07-VCD.pdf.
3. Developing Harmonized European Approaches for Transport Costing and Project Assessment. Deliverable 1. Current Practice in Project Appraisal in Europe. European Commission EC-DG TREN, 2005. URL: http://heatco.ier.uni-stuttgart.de/hd1final.pdf.
4. Facts and Furphies in Benefit-Cost Analysis: Transport. Canberra: Bureau of Transport Economics, 1999. URL: http://www.bitre.gov.au/publications/24/Files/r100.pdf.
5. Improved Decision aid Methods and Tools to Support Evaluation of Investment for Transport and Energy Networks in Europe. Deliverable 1. Evaluating the State-of-the-art in Investment for Transport and Energy Networks. 2008. URL: http://www.eva-tren.eu/Documenti/D1.pdf.
6. Lichfield N., Kettle P., Whitbread V. Evaluation in the Planning Process. Oxford; N. Y.: Pergamon Press, 1975.
7. Alexander I. The Planning Balance Sheet: An Appraisal // Australian Project Evaluation: Selected Readings. Sydney: Australia & New Zealand Book Co., 1978.
8. Developing Harmonized European Approaches for Transport Costing and Project Assessment. Deliverable 5. Proposal for Harmonized Guidelines. European Commission EC-DG TREN, 2006. URL: http://heatco.ier.uni-stuttgart.de/HEATCO_D5.pdf).
9. Методика расчета показателей и применения критериев эффективности инвестиционных проектов, претендующих на получение государственной поддержки за счет средств Инвестиционного фонда Российской Федерации. Утверждена приказом Минэкономразвития РФ и Минфина РФ от 23 мая 2006 г. № 139/82н.
10. Гранберг А. Г., Суслов В. И., Суспицын С. А. Многорегиональные системы: экономико-математическое исследование. Новосибирск: Сиб. науч. изд-во, 2007.
11. Суслов В. И. Многорегиональная оптимизационная модель: реальное значение и современная спецификация // Регион: экономика и социология. 2011. № 2. С. 19–45.
12. Азиатская часть России: новый этап освоения северных и восточных регионов страны. Новосибирск: Изд-во ИЭОПП СО РАН, 2008.
13. Rutherford T., Paltsev S. From an Input-Output Table to a General Equilibrium Model: Assessing the Excess Burden of Indirect Taxes in Russia. Department of Economics, University of Colorado, 1999. URL: http://web.mit.edu/paltsev/www/docs/exburden.pdf.
14. Jonkhoff W., Rustenberg M. Indirect Effects in European Transport Appraisal // Infrastructure Productivity Evaluation. N. Y.; Dordrecht; Heidelberg; L.: Springer, 2011. C. 79–94.
15. Wegener M. SASI Model Description / Working Paper No. 08/01. Dortmund: Spiekermann & Wegener Urban and Regional Research, 2008.
16. Ravallion M. The Mystery of the Vanishing Benefits: An Introduction to Impact Evaluation // World Bank Economic Review. 2001. Vol. 15, № 1. P. 115–140.
17. White H. Some Reflections on Current Debates in Impact Evaluation / International Initiative for Impact Evaluation Working Paper No. 1. New Delhi, 2009.
18. Gertler P. J., Martinez S., Premand P., Rawlings L. B., Vermeersch C. M. J. Impact Evaluation in Practice. Washington, D. C.: World Bank, 2011.
19. Improved Decision Aid Methods and Tools to Support Evaluation of Investment for Transport and Energy Networks in Europe. Deliverable 3.2. Methodological Developments. 2008. URL: http://www.eva-tren.eu/Documenti/D3.2_final.pdf.
20. Flyvbjerg B., Holm M. S., Buhl S. Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie? // Journal of the American Planning Association. 2002. Vol. 68, №. 3. P. 279–295. 21. Flyvbjerg B., Holm M. K. S., Buhl S. L. How (In)accurate Are Demand Forecasts in Public Works Projects? The Case of Transportation // Journal of the American Planning Association. 2005. Vol. 71, №. 2. P. 131–146.
21. Харрингтон Х. Дж., Харрингтон Дж. С. Бенчмаркинг в лучшем виде: 20 шагов к успеху. СПб.: Питер, 2004.
Review
For citations:
Gluschenko K.P. Transport project appraisal: experience and problems (part 2). World of Economics and Management. 2012;12(1):40-46. (In Russ.)
Views:
47
Email this article 
