Assessment of urban built environment quality on the urbanized territories: interregional comparisons
Abstract
The urbanization and growth of a cities role, formation of cities as reference points of regions economic development are modern global tendencies. Cities concentrate human and investment resources on their territory, so in large part cities cause competitiveness of the regions in the global market. For preservation of competitive advantages regions need to form on the urbanized territories not only the favorable environment for business, but also for the population life.
This paper deals with the problem of an assessment of urban built environment quality, due to urban built environment is a space-material basis of life quality of the population on the urbanized territories. The role of the cities in social and economic development of regions and their considerable influence on competitiveness of territories in the global competition for economic resources are proved. The method of assessment of urban built environment quality on the basis of calculation of an integrated index is proposed. Interregional comparisons on the example of regions of the Siberian and Ural Federal districts are completed. The offered method of assessment of urban built environment quality allows to range the urbanized territories on usefulness for living, to reveal most and the least developed spheres of city infrastructure.
About the Authors
T. Yu. OvsiannikovaRussian Federation
M. N. Nikolaenko
Russian Federation
References
1. Zubarevich N.V. Regional'noe razvitie i regional'naya politika v Rossii [Regional development and regional policy in Russia]. EKO. Vserossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal. [ECO. All-Russian Economic Journal], 2014, no. 4, p. 7–27. (In Russ.)
2. Regiony Rossii. Social'no-jekonomicheskie pokazateli [Regions of Russia. Social and Economic Indicators]. Moscow : Rosstat, 2012. 397 p. (In Russ.)
3. Ovsyannikova T.Yu., Preobrazhenskaya M.N. Gradostroitel'naya sreda kak prostranstvennomaterial'naya osnova gorodskogo razvitiya [Urban built environment as a space-material basis of city development]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. [Vestnik of Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building], 2014, no 3, p. 191–200. (In Russ.)
4. Kustovaya K.A. Otsenka kachestva gorodskoi sredy prozhivaniya [Assessment of quality of urban environment]. Upravlenie razvitiem territorii [Territory Development Management], 2014, no 4, p. 26–28. (In Russ.)
5. Ovsyannikova T.Yu. Urboserveiing: kontseptsiya perekhoda ot upravleniya ob"ektom k upravleniyu gorodskoi sredoi [Urban surveying: the conception of transition from object manageOE‚ ment of the management of the urban environment]. Nedvizhimost': ekonomika, upravlenie [Real Estate: economics, management], 2014, no 3–4, p. 21–24. (In Russ.)
6. Adams, D., and Tiesdell, S. Shaping Places: Urban Planning, Design and Development. London: Routledge, 2013, 368 p.
7. Yas'kova N.Yu. Transformatsiya podkhodov k prostranstvenno-territorial'nomu razvitiyu gorodov [Transformation of approaches to Spatial Urban Development]. Nedvizhimost': ekonomika, upravlenie [Real Estate: economics, management], 2014, no 3–4, p. 56–60. (In Russ.)
8. Ovsyannikova T.Yu., Preobrazhenskaya M.N. Indeksnyi podkhod k otsenke kachestva zhizni naseleniya i urovnya razvitiya urbanizirovannykh territorii [The index approach for valuation of population's life quality and development level of urbanized territory]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika [Tomsk State University Journal of Economics], 2014, no 1 (25), p. 30–47. (In Russ.)
9. Skuf'ina T.P., Baranov S.V. Mezhregional'nye i mezhgorodskie sopostavleniya kak osobyi vid nauchnogo issledovaniya: teoreticheskii aspekt [Inter-regional and inter-city comparisons as a special kind of scientific research: theoretical aspect]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [The theory and practice of social development], 2011, no 7, p. 322–325. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Ovsiannikova T.Yu., Nikolaenko M.N. Assessment of urban built environment quality on the urbanized territories: interregional comparisons. World of Economics and Management. 2015;15(2):120–131. (In Russ.)