Formation of Scientific and Industrial Complexes in the Digital Economy

The rapid development of the digital economy determines the need to increase the scientific potential and innovation activity of domestic enterprises. The purpose of the article is to study topical issues of scientific and innovative and institutional development of production in Russia, as well as to substantiate the feasibility of forming scientific and industrial complexes in the industrial sector of the country. The object of research is research and production associations, large industrial enterprises and complexes, elements of innovative infrastructure operating in the digital environment. The scientific novelty of the work consists in determining the content of the scientific and industrial complex as a set of integrated enterprises, scientific organizations, design institutes and service assets that function as a single structure and form a common production and engineering cycle in order to produce competitive high-tech products. The list of advantages of the scientific and practical complex in relation to independent (autonomous) enterprises and other forms of market cooperation of economic entities is defined and justified. The applied significance of the work is to identify and analyze systemic problems that hinder the implementation of the economic, scientific and innovative potential of Russian industry. These include the crisis of the state infrastructure approach to innovative industrial development; the weakening of economic ties between industrial complexes and scientific organizations; reduced investment in enterprise modernization; and the dynamic change in business conditions under the influence of the digital economy. As the results of the research, the article presents a model subject-functional structure and an algorithm for the formation of the scientific and industrial complex, which ensure the integration of the potential of industrial, scientific and infrastructure organizations. The research materials can be used by the management of industrial enterprises and research organizations as a theoretical and methodological, information and analytical base for preparing and implementing reforms in the real sector of the domestic economy.

scientific and industrial complex, innovative development, institutional transformation, digital economy

1. Маршалл А. Основы экономической науки: Пер. с англ. М.: Эксмо, 2007. 832 с.

2. Perroux F. Noteon the concept of growth poles. In: Regional economics: Theory and practice. Ed. by D. McKeeetal. New York, The Free Press, 1970, p. 93-103.

3. Портер М. Международная конкуренция. Конкурентные преимущества стран. М.: Международные отношения, 2009. 896 c.

4. Dahmen E. Entrepreneurial Activity and the Development of Swedish Industry, 1919-1939. Stockholm, 1950, 276 p.

5. Weber A. Theory of the Location of Industries. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1929.

6. Tolenado J. A. Propisdes Filieres Industrielles. Revue d‘Economie Industrielle, 1978, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 149-158.

7. Soulie D. Filieres de Production et Integration Vertical. Annales des Mines, Janvier, 1989, p. 21-28.

8. Schumpeter J. A. The Theory of Economic Development. New York, Oxford University Press, 1934.

9. Колосовский Н. Н. Вопросы типологии производственно-территориальных сочетаний (комплексов). Тезисы доклада // Теория экономического районирования. М.: Мысль, 1969. С. 142-148.

10. Некрасов Н. Н. Региональная экономика: Теория, проблемы, методы. 2-е изд. М.: Экономика, 1978. 343 с.

11. Боев А. Г. К вопросу о содержании и дифференциации понятий промышленный комплекс, кластер и индустриальный парк // Организатор производства. 2020. Т. 28, № 2. С. 7-17.

12. Graham L. Will Russia be able to compete? The history of innovations in tsarist, Soviet and modern Russia. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov and Ferber, 2014, 272 p.

13. Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges. Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Ed. by C. Edquist. Oxford University Press, 2006, November.

14. Клейнер Г. Б. Социально-экономические экосистемы в контексте дуального пространственно-временного анализа // Экономика и управление: проблемы и решения. 2018. № 5-5'. С. 5-13.

15. Полтерович В. М. Стратегии институциональных реформ. Перспективные траектории // Экономика и математические методы. 2006. Т. 42, № 1. С. 3-18.

16. Гительман Л. Д. Менеджмент - твоя работа. Действуй на опережение! М.: Инфра-М, 2018. 544 с.

17. Анисимов Ю. П., Журавлев Ю. В., Куксова И. В., Балабанова Е. И., Жильников А. Ю., Елагина Т. В. Пространственный анализ развития инновационного потенциала предприятий // Вестник Воронеж. гос. ун-та инженерных технологий. 2019. № 81 (1). С. 391-396.

18. Смородинская Н. В. Сетевые инновационные экосистемы и их роль в динамизации экономического роста // Инновации. 2014. № 7 (189). С. 27-33.

19. Kotter J. P. Accelerate: Building Strategic Agility for a Faster-Moving World. 2014. 224 p.

20. Боев А. Г., Воронин С. И. Использование SCRUM-метода при реализации проекта по внедрению цифровой платформы промышленного предприятия // Организатор производства. 2019. Т. 27, № 2. С. 16-26.

21. Aptekman A., Kalabin V. McKinsey & Company report “Digital Russia: a new reality” (July, 2017). URL: https://u.to/dr6HFw (accessed date: 14.11.2020).

22. Boev A. G., Anisimov Y. P., Kolodyazhnaya A. A., Lutsenko M. S., Lubyanskaya E. B., Shendrikova O. O. The problems and strategies of innovative transformation of the manufacturing industry. In: Proceedings of the Russian Conference on Digital Economy and Knowledge Management, 2020, p. 81-86. DOI 10.2991/ aebmr.k.200730.015

23. Боев А. Г. Содержание и особенности процесса институциональных преобразований промышленных комплексов в условиях цифровой экономики // Экономика в промышленности. 2020. № 13 (1). С. 18-28.