<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">woeam</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Мир экономики и управления</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>World of Economics and Management</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2542-0429</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2658-5375</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Новосибирский национальный исследовательский государственный университет</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25205/2542-0429-2025-25-3-120-136</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">woeam-945</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МИКРОЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЙ АНАЛИЗ: МЕТОДЫ И РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>MICROECONOMIC ANALYSIS: METHODS AND RESULTS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Устойчивое развитие, корпоративная устойчивость и корпоративная социальная ответственность: иерархия концепций в контексте поведения фирм</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Sustainable Development, Corporate Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility: a Hierarchy of Concepts in the Context of Firm Behavior</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6330-3602</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Петров</surname><given-names>С. П.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Petrov</surname><given-names>S. P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Петров Сергей Павлович, кандидат экономических наук, доцент, заведующий отделом прикладных региональных исследований</p><p>Researcher ID: U-1953-2018</p><p>Scopus Author ID: 56849995700 </p><p>Новосибирск</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Sergey P. Petrov, Candidate of Economics Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Applied Regional Studies, Head of the Department</p><p>Researcher ID: U-1953-2018</p><p>Scopus Author ID: 56849995700 </p><p>Novosibirsk</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">petrov.s.p@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Институт экономики и организации промышленного производства СО РАН<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>120</fpage><lpage>136</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Петров С.П., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Петров С.П.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Petrov S.P.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://woeam.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/945">https://woeam.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/945</self-uri><abstract><p>Концепция устойчивого развития стала одним из основных направлений развития современного общества и проявляется на различных уровнях – от политики государства до предпочтений отдельного индивида. Сама концепция при всей дискуссионности ее формулировки носит фундаментальный характер и связана с развитием общества. Через стремление общества к такому развитию началось изменение поведения фирм, для описания чего в зарубежной и отечественной литературе используются различные категории и концепции. Достаточно широкое распространение среди них получили две концепции на уровне фирмы – корпоративной устойчивости и корпоративной социальной ответственности. Однако, несмотря на наличие работ как теоретического, так и прикладного характера, не предложено четкого подхода к их разграничению, равно как и всеобъемлющего сопоставления с концепцией устойчивого развития. Поскольку современное развитие ориентировано на учет устойчивости, необходимо понимание отличий данных трех концепций, лежащих в их основе категорий, субъектов приложения, как и выделение элементов их сопряжения. В данной работе на основе обзора существующих подходов к трактовке концепций устойчивого развития, корпоративной устойчивости и корпоративной социальной ответственности предложен подход к их разграничению через построение иерархии в контексте влияния на поведение фирм. Выбор последнего как критерия выделения иерархического соотношения концепций обоснован тем, что именно фирмы являются основными субъектами перехода экономики к устойчивому развитию через наличие необходимых ресурсов для реализации соответствующих стратегий в области экономики, экологии и социальной сферы.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The sustainable development concept has become one of the main directions of the modern society development from government policy to individual preferences. Despite the controversial nature of its formulation, the concept itself is fundamental and related to the society development. Through the desire of society for such development, a change in the behavior of firms began, for which various categories and concepts are used in foreign and domestic literature. Two concepts at the firm level have become quite widespread among them – corporate sustainability and corporate social responsibility. However, despite the availability of both theoretical and applied researches, no clear approach to their differentiation has been proposed, as well as a comprehensive comparison with the concept of sustainable development. Since modern development is focused on sustainability, it is necessary to understand the differences between these three concepts, the underlying categories, the subjects of the application, as well as the identification of the elements of their interface. In this paper, based on a review of existing approaches to interpreting the concepts of sustainable development, corporate sustainability and corporate social responsibility, an approach is proposed to distinguish them through building a hierarchy in the context of influencing the behavior of firms. The choice of the last one as a criterion for distinguishing the hierarchical relationship of concepts is justified by the fact that it is firms that are the main actors in the transition of the economy to sustainable development through the availability of the necessary resources to implement appropriate strategies in the field of economy, ecology and the social sphere.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>устойчивое развитие</kwd><kwd>корпоративная устойчивость</kwd><kwd>корпоративная социальная ответственность</kwd><kwd>поведение фирмы</kwd><kwd>экономический капитал</kwd><kwd>природный капитал</kwd><kwd>социальный капитал</kwd><kwd>модель «тройного итога»</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>sustainable development</kwd><kwd>corporate sustainability</kwd><kwd>corporate social responsibility</kwd><kwd>firm behavior</kwd><kwd>economic capital</kwd><kwd>natural capital</kwd><kwd>social capital</kwd><kwd>triple bottom line model</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group xml:lang="ru"><funding-statement>Исследование выполнено по плану НИР ИЭОПП СО РАН, проект «Интеграция и взаимодействие мезоэкономических систем и рынков в России и ее восточных регионах: методология, анализ, прогнозирование» №121040100284-9.</funding-statement></funding-group><funding-group xml:lang="en"><funding-statement>The research was carried out with the plan of research work of IEIE SB RAS, project «Integration and interaction of mesoeconomic systems and markets in Russia and its Eastern parts: methodology, analysis, forecasting» №121040100284-9.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Белоусов К. Ю. Ключевые направления интерпретации и взаимосвязь концепций устойчивого развития, корпоративной устойчивости и корпоративной социальной ответственности // Проблемы современной экономики. 2013. № 2 (46). С. 51–54.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">“Development and International Economic Cooperation: environmental issues” Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. UN. URL: http:// www.un.org/ru/ga/pdf/brundtland.pdf (last accessed: 09/12/2023).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Белоусов К. Ю. Устойчивое развитие компании и корпоративная устойчивость: проблемы интерпретации // Проблемы современной экономики. 2012. № 4 (44). С. 120–123.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ali M. “Chapter 5 – Issues of Sustainability Assessment” in Sustainability Assessment: Context of Resource and Environmental Policy. Academic Press, 2013, pp. 59–71. DOI:10.1016/b978-0-12-407196-4.00005-2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Доклад Всемирной Комиссии ООН по вопросам окружающей среды и развития «Развитие и международное экономическое сотрудничество: проблемы окру жающей среды». Distr. GВNВRAL А/42/427, 4 August 1987, США URL: http://www.un.org/ru/ga/pdf/brundtland.pdf (дата обращения: 12.09.2023).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bansal P. Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, no. 26(3), pp. 197–218. DOI: 10.1002/smj.441</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зинченко Ю. В. Политика корпоративного сектора российской и мировой экономики в условиях перехода к устойчивому развитию (на примере промышленности): дис. … канд. экон. наук по спец. 08.00.05 – Экономика и управление народным хозяйством, 08.00.14 – Мировая экономика, 2020. 224 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Becchetti L., Bruni L., Zamagni S. The microeconomics of wellbeing and sustainability. Elsevier Inc, 2020. 449 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Канаева О. А. Корпоративная социальная ответственность: эволюция теоретических взглядов // Вестник С.-Петербург. ун-та. Экономика. 2013. № 2. С. 130– 145.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Belousov K. Yu. Company’s sustainable development and corporate sustainability: interpretation problems. Problems of modern economics, 2012, no. 4 (44), pp. 120– 123. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Малышенко А. Ю., Киселев А. К. Корпоративная социальная ответственность и устойчивое развитие: сущность и практика // Sciences of Europe. 2019. № 40. С. 6–10.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Belousov K. Yu. Key interpretation areas and interrelation of sustainable development, corporate sustainability and corporate social responsibility conceptions. Problems of modern economics, 2013, no. 2 (46), pp. 51–54. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Старикова Е. А. Современные подходы к трактовке концепции устойчивого развития // Вестник РУДН. Серия: Экономика. 2017. Т. 25, № 1. С. 7–17. DOI 10.22363/2313-2329-2017-25-1-7-17</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Carroll A. B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The Academy of Management Review, 1979, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 497–505. DOI: 10.2307/257850</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Уильямсон О. И. Экономические институты капитализма: Фирмы, рынки, «отношенческая» контроктация. СПб.: Лениздат; CEV Press, 1996. 702 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Carroll A. B. Corporate social responsibility: the centerpiece of competing and complementary frameworks. Organizational Dynamics, 2015, vol. 44, no 2, pp. 87–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.02.002</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фридман М. Капитализм и свобода. М.: Новое издательство, 2016. 288 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Choukar E., El Hamidi N., Ait Hbibi A., Makhrout S. CSR and financial performance: are CSR practices a factor in reducing transaction costs? International Journal of Economic Studies and Management (IJESM), 2021, iss. 1, no. 2, pp. 307–320. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11473043</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ali M. “Chapter 5 – Issues of Sustainability Assessment” in Sustainability Assessment: Context of Resource and Environmental Policy // Academic Press. 2013. Р. 59–71. DOI:10.1016/b978-0-12-407196-4.00005-2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">DesRoches C. T. On the Concept and Conservation of Critical Natural Capital. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2020.1788347</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bansal P. Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development // Strategic Management Journal. 2005. No. 26 (3). P. 197–218. DOI: 10.1002/smj.441</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dyllick T., Hockerts K. Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2002, vol. 11, pp. 130–141. DOI: 10.1002/bse.323</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Becchetti L., Bruni L., Zamagni S. The microeconomics of wellbeing and sustainability. Elsevier Inc, 2020. 449 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Elkington J. Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. California Management Review, 1994, vol. 36, iss. 2, pp. 90–100. DOI: 10.2307/4116574</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Carroll A. B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance // The Academy of Management Review. 1979. Vol. 4, No. 4. P. 497–505. DOI: 10.2307/257850</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Elliott J. A. An Introduction to Sustainable Development. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013. 384 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Carroll A. B. Corporate social responsibility: the centerpiece of competing and complementary frameworks // Organizational Dynamics. 2015. Vol. 44. No 2. P. 87–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.02.002</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Friedman M. Capitalism and Freedom. Moscow: Novoe izdatelstvo, 2016. 288 p. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Choukar E., El Hamidi N., Ait Hbibi A., Makhrout S. CSR and financial performance: are CSR practices a factor in reducing transaction costs? // International Journal of Economic Studies and Management (IJESM). 2021. Iss. 1. No. 2. P. 307–320. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11473043</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gibson R. B. Beyond the Pillars: Sustainability Assessment as a Framework for Effective Integration of Social, Economic and Ecological Considerations in Significant Decision-Making. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 2006, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 259–280. DOI: 10.1142/S1464333206002517</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">DesRoches C. T. On the Concept and Conservation of Critical Natural Capital // International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 2020. DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2020.1788347</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gibson R. B. Sustainability assessment: basic components of a practical approach. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 2006, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 170–182. DOI: 10.3152/147154606781765147</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dyllick T., Hockerts K. Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability // Business Strategy and the Environment. 2002. Vol. 11. Р. 130–141. DOI: 10.1002/bse.323</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gupta K., Krishnamurti C. “Chapter 19 – Product market competition and corporate environmental performance” in Handbook of Environmental and Sustainable Finance. Academic Press Inc., 2016. pp. 385–404.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Elkington J. Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development // California Management Review. 1994, Vol. 36. Iss. 2. Р. 90–100. DOI: 10.2307/4116574</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hull Z. Sustainable Development: Premises, Understanding and Prospects. Sustainable Development, 2008, vol. 16, pp. 73–80. DOI: 10.1002/sd.337</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Elliott J. A. An Introduction to Sustainable Development. Abingdon. Routledge, 2013. 384 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jensen M. C. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2002, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 235–256.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gibson R. B. Beyond the Pillars: Sustainability Assessment as a Framework for Effective Integration of Social, Economic and Ecological Considerations in Significant Decision-Making // Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 2006a. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 259–280. DOI: 10.1142/S1464333206002517</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kanaeva O. A. Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of Theoretical Views. St. Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, 2013, no. 2, pp. 130–145. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gibson R. B. Sustainability assessment: basic components of a practical approach // Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 2006b. Vol. 24. No. 3. P. 170–182. DOI: 10.3152/147154606781765147</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ketprapakorn N., Kantabutra S. Toward an organizational theory of sustainability culture. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2022, vol. 32, pp. 638–654. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.020</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gupta K., Krishnamurti C. “Chapter 19 – Product market competition and corporate environmental performance” in Handbook of Environmental and Sustainable Finance. Academic Press Inc., 2016. Р. 385–404.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Landrum N. E. Stages of Corporate Sustainability: Integrating the Strong Sustainability Worldview. Organization &amp; Environment, 2017, vol. 31, iss. 4. DOI: 10.1177/1086026617717456</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hull Z. Sustainable Development: Premises, Understanding and Prospects // Sustainable Development. 2008. Vol. 16. Р. 73–80. DOI: 10.1002/sd.337</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Landrum N. E., Ohsowski B. Identifying Worldviews on Corporate Sustainability: A Content Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reports. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2018, vol. 27, pp. 128–151. DOI: 10.1002/bse.1989</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jensen M. C. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function // Business Ethics Quarterly. 2002. Vol. 12, No. 2. P. 235–256.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Malyshenko A., Kiselev A. Corporate social responsibility and sustainable development: essence and practice. Sciences of Europe, 2019, no. 40, pp. 6–10. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ketprapakorn N., Kantabutra S. Toward an organizational theory of sustainability culture // Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2022. Vol. 32. Р. 638–654. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.020</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Montiel I. Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability: Separate Pasts, Common Futures. Organization Environment, 2008, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 245–269. DOI: 10.1177/1086026608321329</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Landrum N. E. Stages of Corporate Sustainability: Integrating the Strong Sustainability Worldview // Organization &amp; Environment. 2017. Vol. 31. Iss. 4. DOI: 10.1177/1086026617717456</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Montiel I., Delgado-Ceballos J. Defining and Measuring Corporate Sustainability: Are We There Yet? Organization &amp; Environment, 2014, vol. 27, iss. 2, pp. 113–139. DOI: 10.1177/1086026614526413</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Landrum N. E., Ohsowski B. Identifying Worldviews on Corporate Sustainability: A Content Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reports // Business Strategy and the Environment. 2018. Vol. 27. Р. 128–151. DOI: 10.1002/bse.1989</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pelenc J., Ballet J., Dedeurwaerdere T. Weak Sustainability versus Strong Sustainability. Brief for GSDR, UN, 2015. URL: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/6569122-Pelenc-Weak%20Sustainability%20versus%20Strong%20Sustainability.pdf (last accessed 09/11/2024).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Montiel I. Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability: Separate Pasts, Common Futures // Organization Environment. 2008. Vol. 21. No. 3. P. 245–269. DOI: 10.1177/1086026608321329</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Roome N. Looking Back, Thinking Forward: Distinguishing Between Weak and Strong Sustainability. Oxford Handbooks Online, 2011, no. 11. DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/978019958</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Montiel I., Delgado-Ceballos J. Defining and Measuring Corporate Sustainability: Are We There Yet? // Organization &amp; Environment. 2014. Vol. 27. Iss. 2. Р. 113–139. DOI: 10.1177/1086026614526413</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ruggerio C. A. Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions. Science of The Total Environment, 2021, vol. 786. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147481</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pelenc J., Ballet J., Dedeurwaerdere T. Weak Sustainability versus Strong Sustainability. Brief for GSDR, UN, 2015. URL: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/6569122-Pelenc-Weak%20Sustainability%20versus%20Strong%20Sustainability.pdf (last accessed 09/11/2024).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Solow R. An almost practical step toward sustainability. Resources Policy. 1993, no. 19 (3), pp. 162–172. DOI: 10.1016/0301-4207(93)90001-4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Roome N. Looking Back, Thinking Forward: Distinguishing Between Weak and Strong Sustainability // Oxford Handbooks Online. 2011. No. 11. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/978019958</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Starikova E. A. The contemporary approaches to interpretation of the sustainable development concept. RUDN Journal of Economics, 2017, no. 25 (1), pp. 7–17. DOI 10.22363/2313-2329-2017-25-1-7-17 (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ruggerio C. A. Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions // Science of The Total Environment. 2021. Vol. 786. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147481</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Williamson O. E. The economic institutions of capitalism. Firms, markets, relational contracting. St. Petersburg: Lenizdat; CEV Press, 1996. 702 p. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Solow R. An almost practical step toward sustainability // Resources Policy. 1993. No. 19 (3). P. 162–172. DOI: 10.1016/0301-4207(93)90001-4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zinchenko Yu. V. Corporate sector policy of the Russian and global economies in the context of transition to sustainable development. Thesis, 2020. 224 p. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
