woeamМир экономики и управленияWorld of Economics and Management2542-04292658-5375Новосибирский национальный исследовательский государственный университет10.25205/2542-0429-2021-21-4-5-23woeam-226Research ArticleМАКРОЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЙ АНАЛИЗ: МЕТОДЫ И РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫMACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS: METHODS AND RESULTSКонцепция экономического равновесия в пространственных системахThe Concept of Economic Equilibrium in Spatial Systemshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8540-5039ИбрагимовН. М.IbragimovN. M.

Наимджон Мулабоевич Ибрагимов, кандидат экономических наук, доцент

SPIN 73169, Scopus Author ID 57202757558

Новосибирск

Naimdzhon M. Ibragimov, Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor

SPIN 73169, Scopus Author ID 57202757558

Novosibirsk

naimdjon.ibragimov@nsu.ruИнститут экономики и организации промышленного производства СО РАН; Новосибирский национальный исследовательский государственный университетРоссияInstitute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State UniversityRussian Federation202122122021214523Copyright © Ибрагимов Н.М., 20212021Ибрагимов Н.М.Ibragimov N.M.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://woeam.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/226

Межрегиональная интеграция – важнейшее свойство и форма проявления единства экономического пространства, в частности российского. Изучение этого феномена выступает значимым направлением исследований пространственного развития страны. В статье исследованы и систематизированы исторические предпосылки используемых подходов, основанные на теории экономического равновесия. Выполнено описание и проведен анализ различных форм пространственного экономического равновесия, адекватных современному уровню развития и математическому представлению экономики. Представлено развитие концепции экономического равновесия в экономико-математических моделях. Показано, что простота математической конструкции ОМММ позволяет, используя все концепции экономического равновесия, осуществлять анализ особенностей межрегиональных экономических взаимодействий и оценивать степень экономической взаимозависимости регионов России. Экономическое пространство в ОМММ представляется дискретно, в разрезе макрорегионов, в качестве которых выступают федеральные округа или их крупные фрагменты, объединяющие по несколько субъектов федерации. Экономика каждого макрорегиона представлена в разрезе агрегированных секторов производства продукции и услуг. По секторам с транспортабельной продукцией учитываются межрегиональные транспортно-экономические связи.

Interregional integration is the most important property and form of manifestation of the unity of any economic space, in particular Russian. The study of this phenomenon is a significant area of research on the spatial development of the country. In the article the historical preconditions of the used approaches based on the theory of economic equilibrium have been studied and systematized. We have described and analyzed various forms of spatial economic equilibrium which are adequate to the modern level of development and mathematical representation of economy. The development of the concept of economic equilibrium in economic and mathematical models is presented. It is shown that the simplicity of the mathematical structure of the OMIOM allows, using all the concepts of economic equilibrium, to analyze the features of interregional economic interactions and assess the degree of economic interdependence of the regions of Russia. The economic space in the OMIOM is presented discretely, in the context of macro-regions, which are federal districts or their large fragments, uniting several subjects of the federation. The economy of each macroregion is presented in the context of the aggregated sectors of production of goods and services. For sectors with transportable products, interregional transport and economic ties are taken into account.

экономическое равновесияCGE-моделиОМММПарето-оптимальностьэквивалентный и взаимовыгодный обменeconomic equilibriumCGE modelsOMIOMPareto optimalityequivalent and mutually beneficial exchangeСтатья подготовлена по плану НИР ИЭОПП СО РАН, проект 5.6.6.4 (0260-2021-0007) «Инстру-менты, технологии и результаты анализа, моделирования и прогнозирования пространствен- ного развития социально-экономической системы России и её отдельных территорий», № 121040100262-7The article was prepared according to the research plan of the IEIE SB RAS, the project “Tools, tech-nologies and results of analysis, modeling and forecasting of the spatial development of the socio-economic system of Russia and its individual territories”, no. 0260-2021-0007ReferencesArrow K. J., Debreu G. Existence of equilibrium for competitive economy. Econometrica, 1954, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 265–290.Arrow K.J., Debreu G. Existence of equilibrium for competitive economy // Econometrica, 1954. Vol. 22, No. 3. (Jul., 1954), pp. 265–290.McKenzie L. W. On equilibrium in Graham’s model of world trade and other competitive systems. Econometrica, 1954, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 147–161.Ashraf Q., Gershman B., Howitt P. Macroeconomics in a Self-Organizing Economy // Revue de l’OFCE. 2012. No. 124, pp. 43–65.Florenzano M. General Equilibrium. Mathematical Models in Economics, 2008, vol. 1. URL: https://www.eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C02/E6-154-07-00.pdf (accessed October 2021).Bajo-Rubio O., Gomez-Plana A.G. Simulating the Effects of the European Single Market: A CGE Analysis for Spain // Journal of Policy Modeling. 2005. Vol. 27, Iss. 6, pp. 689-709.Caballero R. Macroeconomics after the Crisis: Time to Deal with the Pretenseof-Knowledge Syndrome. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2010, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 85–102.Caballero R. Macroeconomics after the Crisis: Time to Deal with the Pretense-of-Knowledge Syndrome // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2010. Vol. 24, Iss. 4, pp. 85–102.Krugman P. How Did Economists Get It So Wrong? The New York Times, 2009, September 2.Diao X., Fan Sh., Zhang X. China's WTO Accession: Impacts on Regional Agricultural Income – a Multi-region, General Equilibrium Analysis // Journal of Comparative Economics. 2003. Vol. 31, Iss. 2, pp. 332-351.Stiglitz J. Rethinking macroeconomics: what failed and how to repair it. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2011, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 591–645.Dixon P.B., Rimmer M.T. The US Economy from 1992 to 1998 Results from a detailed CGE Model // Centre of Policy Studies, Monash University. 2004. No. G-144. URL: https://www.copsmodels.com/ftp/workpapr/g-144.pdf (accessed October 2021).Trichet J. Reflections on the Nature of Monetary Policy Non-Standard Measures and Finance Theory. Opening address at the ECB Central Banking Conference Frankfurt, 2010, November 18.Fagiolo G., Roventini A. Macroeconomic Policy in DSGE and Agent-Based Models // Revue de l’OFCE. 2012. No. 124, pp. 67–116.Leijonhufvud A. A Not-Too-Rational Macroeconomics. Southern Economic Journal, 1993, vol. 60, pp. 1–13.Florenzano M. General Equilibrium // Mathematical Models in Economics. 2008. Vol. 1. https://www.eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C02/E6-154-07-00.pdf (accessed October 2021).Ashraf Q., Gershman B., Howitt P. Macroeconomics in a Self-Organizing Economy. Revue de l’OFCE, 2012, no. 124, pp. 43–65.Gamidov T.G., Domozhirov D.A., Ibragimov N.M. Equilibrium states of open interregional system based on interregional intersectoral optimization model // World of Economics and Management, 2013. Vol. 13, pp. 81–94. (In Russ.)Fagiolo G., Roventini A. Macroeconomic Policy in DSGE and Agent-Based Models. Revue de l’OFCE, 2012, no. 124, pp. 67–116.Gamidov T.G., Domozhirov D.A., Ibragimov N.M. Walrasian equilibrium in a model of regions' interaction with conditional centers. equivalence of theoretical approach and applied technique // World of Economics and Management, 2011. Vol. 11, pp. 12–26. (In Russ.)Scarf H. The Computation of Equilibrium Prices: An Exposition. In: Arrow K., Kirman A. (eds.). Handbook of Mathematical Economics. North-Holland, 1982, vol. 11, chap. 4, pp. 1007–1061.Giesecke J.A., Madden J.R. A Large-Scale Dynamic Multi-Regional CGE Model with an Illustrative Application // Review of Urbanand Regional Development Studies. 2003. Vol. 15, Iss. 1, pp. 2-25.Суслов В. И., Доможиров Д. А., Ибрагимов Н. М., Костин В. С., Мельникова Л. В., Цыплаков А. А. Агент-ориентированная многорегиональная модель «затраты-выпуск» российской экономики // Экономика и математические методы. 2016. Т. 52, № 1. С. 112–131.Harberger A. The Incidence of the Corporate Income Tax // Journal of Political Economy. 1962. Vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 215–240.Макаров В. Л., Бахтизин А. Р., Сулакшин С. С. Применение вычислимых моделей в государственном управлении. М.: Научный эксперт, 2007. 304 с.Hosoe N. The Deregulation of Japan's Electricity Industry // Japan and the World Economy. 2006. Vol. 18, Iss. 2, pp. 230-246.Гамидов Т. Г., Доможиров Д. А., Ибрагимов Н. М. Равновесие Вальраса в модели взаимодействия регионов с условными центрами. Эквивалентность теоретического подхода и прикладного метода // Вестник НГУ. Серия: Социально-экономические науки. 2011. Т. 11, № 3. С. 12–26.Ibragimov N.M. Modeling of trade and economic interaction of regional economic systems. Dis. Candidate of Economic Sciences: 08.00.13. Novosibirsk, 2006. 209 p. RGB OD, 61:06-8/1869. (In Russ.)Yang Z. A coupling Algorithm for Computing Large-Scale Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium Models. Economic Modeling, 1999, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 455–473.Isard W., Azis I.J., Drennan M.P., Miller R.E., Saltzman S., Thorbecke E. Methods of Interregional and Regional Analysis. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998. 490 p.Bajo-Rubio O., Gomez-Plana A. G. Simulating the Effects of the European Single Market: A CGE Analysis for Spain. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2005, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 689–709.Jacoby H.D., Reilly J.M., McFarland J.R., S. Paltsev. Technology and Technical Change in the MIT EPPA Model // Energy Economics. 2006. Vol. 28, Iss. 5-6, pp. 610-631.Hosoe N. The Deregulation of Japan’s Electricity Industry. Japan and the World Economy, 2006, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 230–246.Krugman P. How Did Economists Get It So Wrong? // The New York Times. 2009. 2 sept.Learmonth D., McGregor P. G., Swales J. K., Turner K. R., Yin Y. P. The Importance of the Regional / Local Dimension of Sustainable Development: An Illustrative Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of the Jersey Economy. Economic Modeling, 2007, vol. 24, pp. 15–41.Learmonth D., McGregor P.G., Swales J.K., Turner K.R., Yin Y.P. The Importance of the Regional/Local Dimension of Sustainable Development: An Illustrative Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of the Jersey Economy // Economic Modelling. 2007. Vol. 24, pp. 15-41.Dixon P. B., Rimmer M. T. The US Economy from 1992 to 1998 Results from a detailed CGE Model. Centre of Policy Studies, Monash University, 2004, no. G-144. URL: https://www.copsmodels.com/ftp/workpapr/g-144.pdf (accessed October 2021)Lee H., Van der Mensbrugghe D. EU Enlargement and its Impacts on East Asia // Journal of Asian Economics. 2004. Vol. 14, Iss. 6, pp. 843-860.Diao X., Fan Sh., Zhang X. China’s WTO Accession: Impacts on Regional Agricultural Income – a Multi-region, General Equilibrium Analysis. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2003, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 332–351.Leijonhufvud A. a Not-Too-Rational Macroeconomics // Southern Economic Journal. 1993. Vol. 60, pp. 1-13.Lofgren H., Robinson Sh. Spatial-Network, General-Equilibrium Model with a stylized Application. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2002, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 651–671.Lloyd P.J., MacLaren D. Measures of Trade Openness Using CGE Analysis // Journal of Policy Modeling. 2002. Vol. 24, Iss. 1, pp. 67-81.Lee H., Mensbrugghe D. van der. EU Enlargement and its Impacts on East Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 2004, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 843–860.Lofgren H., Robinson Sh. Spatial-Network, General-Equilibrium Model with a stylized Application // Regional Science and Urban Economics. 2002. Vol. 32, Iss. 5, pp 651-671.Jacoby H. D., Reilly J. M., McFarland J. R., Paltsev S. Technology and Technical Change in the MIT EPPA Model. Energy Economics, 2006, vol. 28, no. 5– 6, pp. 610–631.Makarov V.L., Bakhtizin A.R., Sulakshin S.S. Application of computable models in public administration. Moscow: Scientific Expert, 2007. 304 p.Lloyd P. J., MacLaren D. Measures of Trade Openness Using CGE Analysis. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2002, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 67–81.McKenzie L.W. On equilibrium in Graham’s model of world trade and other competitive systems // Econometrica, 1954. Vol. 22, Iss. 2, pp. 147–161.Taylor L. Socially Relevant Policy Analysis: Structuralist Computable General Equilibrium Models for the Developing World. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1990, 379 p.Petter M.W., Horridge M., Meagher G.A., Naqvi F. and Parmenter B.P. The Theoretical Structure of MONASH-MRF // Monash University Center of Policy Studies Working Paper. 1996. No. OP-86. URL: http://www.monash.edu.au/policy (accessed October 2021).Harberger A. The Incidence of the Corporate Income Tax. Journal of Political Economy, 1962, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 215–240.Scarf H. The Computation of Economic Equilibria. New Haven and London: Yale University Press,1973. 249 p.Scarf H. The Computation of Economic Equilibria. New Haven and London, Yale Uni. Press, 1973, 249 p.Scarf H. The Computation of Equilibrium Prices: An Exposition / Handbook of Mathematical Economics. Eds. K. Arrow, A. Kirman. Vol. 11, Chap. 4. North-Holland, 1982, pp. 1007-1061.Petter M. W., Horridge M., Meagher G. A., Naqvi F., Parmenter B. P. The Theoretical Structure of MONASH-MRF. Monash University Center of Policy Studies Working Paper, 1996, no. OP-86. URL: http://www.monash.edu.au/policy (accessed October 2021).Stiglitz J. Rethinking macroeconomics: what failed and how to repair it // Journal of the European Economic Association. 2011. Vol. 9, Iss. 4, pp. 591-645.Szeto K. L. A Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model of the New Zealand Economy. New Zealand Treasury Working Paper, 2002, no. 02/07. URL: https://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/wp/dynamic-computable-generalequilibrium-cge-model-new-zealand-economy-wp-02-07-html#section-8 (accessed October 2021).Suslov V.I. Measuring the effects of interregional interactions: models, methods, results. Novosibirsk: Nauka, Siberian Branch, 1991. 252 p. (In Russ.)Isard W., Azis I. J., Drennan M. P., Miller R. E., Saltzman S., Thorbecke E. Methods of Interregional and Regional Analysis. Aldershot, Ashgate, 1998, 490 p.Suslov V.I., Domozhirov D.A., Ibragimov N.M., Kostin V.S., Melnikova L.V., Tsyplakov A.A. Agent-based multiregional input-output model of the russian economy // Economics and Mathematical Methods, 2016, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 112–131. (In Russ.)Giesecke J. A., Madden J. R. A Large-Scale Dynamic Multi-Regional CGE Model with an Illustrative Application. Review of Urbanand Regional Development Studies, 2003, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 2–25.Szeto K.L. A Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model of the New Zealand Economy // New Zealand Treasury Working Paper. 2002. No. 02/07. URL: https://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/wp/dynamic-computable-general-equilibrium-cge-model-new-zealand-economy-wp-02-07-html#section-8 (accessed October 2021).Васильев В. А., Суслов В. И. О неблокируемых состояниях многорегиональных экономических систем // Сибирский журнал индустриальной математики. 2009. T. 12, № 4. С. 23–34.Taylor L. Socially Relevant Policy Analysis: Structuralist Computable General Equilibrium Models for the Developing World. Cambridge: MIT press, 1990. 379 p.Васильев В. А., Суслов В. И. Равновесие Эджворта в одной модели межрегиональных экономических отношений // Сибирский журнал индустриальной математики. 2010. T. 13, № 1. С. 18–33.Trichet J. Reflections on the Nature of Monetary Policy Non-Standard Measures and Finance Theory / Opening address at the ECB Central Banking Conference Frankfurt, 18 November 2010.Васильев В. А. О существовании вальрасовского равновесия в модели межрегиональных экономических отношений // Дискретный анализ и исследование операций. 2012. Т. 19, вып. 4. С. 15–34.Vasil’ev V.A. On the existence of a walrasian equilibrium in a model of interregional economic relations // Discrete analysis and operations research, 2012, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 15–34. (In Russ.)Суслов В. И. Измерение эффектов межрегиональных взаимодействий: модели, методы, результаты. Новосибирск: Наука, 1991. 252 с.Vasil’ev V.A., Suslov V.I. On the unblockable states of multiregional economic systems // Journal of Applied and Industrial Mathematics, 2009, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 23–34. (In Russ.)Ибрагимов Н. М. Моделирование торгово-экономического взаимодействия региональных экономических систем: Дис. … канд. экон. наук. Новосибирск, 2006. 209 с. РГБ ОД, 61:06–8/1869.Vasil’ev V.A., Suslov V.I. Edgeworth equilibrium in a model of interregional economic relations // Journal of Applied and Industrial Mathematics, 2010, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 18–33. (In Russ.)Гамидов Т. Г., Доможиров Д. А., Ибрагимов Н. М. Равновесные состояния открытой межрегиональной системы, порожденной оптимизационной межрегиональной межотраслевой моделью // Вестник НГУ. Серия: Социально-экономические науки. 2013. Т. 13, № 3. С. 81–94.Yang Z. A coupling Algorithm for Computing Large-Scale Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium Models // Economic Modelling. 1999. Vol. 16, Iss. 3, pp. 455-473.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.